The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 135–141 | Cite as

The New Frontier: A Review of Changing Cultural Practices: A Contextualist Framework for Intervention Research by A. Biglan

On Books


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 313–327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Glenn, S. S. (1991). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Relations among behavioral, cultural, and biological evolution. In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 39–73). New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  5. Glenn, S. S. (1993). Windows on the 21st century. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 133–151.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Glenn, S. S., & Malagodi, E. F. (1991). Process and content in behavioral and cultural phenomena. Behavior and Social Issues, 1, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greene, B. F., Winett, R. A., Van Houten, R., Geller, E. S., & Iwata, B. A. (Eds.). (1987). Behavior analysis in the community: 1968–1986. Lawrence, KS: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.Google Scholar
  8. Harris, M. (1979). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, M. (1989). Our kind. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  10. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hocutt, M. (1994). Some truths about truth: An editorial. Behavior and Philosophy, 22(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  12. Lamal, P. A. (Ed.). (1991). Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  13. Malagodi, E. F. (1986). On radicalizing behaviorism: A call for cultural analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 1–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Mattaini, M. A. (1996). Envisioning cultural practices: Diagrammatic techniques. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  15. Morris, E. K. (1982). ABA presidential address: The aim, progress, and evolution of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Skinner, B. F. (1984). The evolution of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 217–221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Why we are not acting to save the world. In Upon further reflection (pp. 1–14). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Originally delivered to the American Psychological Association Conference, August, 1982)Google Scholar
  21. Skinner, B. F. (1988). Reply to Donahoe. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences (p. 38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WorkColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations