The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 117–119 | Cite as

Mechanistic Ontology and Contextualistic Epistemology: Response to Barnes and Roche

  • Hayne W. Reese
In Response
  • 2 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1994). Mechanistic ontology and contextualistic epistemology: A contradiction within behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 165–168.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Lenin, V. I. (1927). Materialism and empirio-criticism: Critical comments on a reactionary philosophy. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Prosch, H. (1964). The genesis of twentieth century philosophy: The evolution of thought from Copernicus to the present. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Reese, H. W. (1993a). Comments about Morris’s paper. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 67–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Reese, H. W. (1993b). Contextualism and dialectical materialism. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 71–105). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  7. Zukav, G. (1979). The dancing Wu Li masters: An overview of the new physics. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hayne W. Reese
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations