Summary
To summarize, I agree with Watkins (1990) that there has been a problem of too many theories and too few constraints in contemporary research in memory and cognition, but I disagree as to the source of the problem or its likely solution. Any discipline should evolve, and in the process establish linkages with related disciplines. Those other disciplines can then be a valuable source of constraints on theories, and can also provide powerful new sets of methodological or analytical tools. It remains to be seen whether those constraints and tools will be effectively employed in the field of memory research, but the fact that they exist and are starting to be recognized suggests that Watkins’ (1990) prognosis may be too pessimistic.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watkins, M. J. (1990). Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. American Psychologist, 45, 328–335.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salthouse, T.A. Commentary on Watkins (1990): There Are Other Solutions to the Problem of Proliferating Memory Theories. BEHAV ANALYST 19, 105–108 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392747
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392747