Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 167–169 | Cite as

Analysis of Complex Human Behavior: A Reply to Staats

In Response

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Koch, S. (1954). Clark L. Hull. In W. K. Estes, S. Koch, K. MacCorquodale, P. E. Meehl, C. G. Mueller, W. N. Schoenfeld, & W. S. Verplanck (Eds.), Modern learning theory (pp. 1–176). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  2. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Plaud, J. J. (1992). Should we take the “radical” out of the “behaviorism”?: Some comments about behavior therapy and philosophy. The Behavior Therapist, 15, 121–122, 128.Google Scholar
  4. Plaud, J. J. (1993). Paradigmatic behaviorism, pragmatic philosophy and unified science. The Behavior Therapist, 16, 101–103.Google Scholar
  5. Plaud, J. J. (1994). Where have all the paradigmatic behaviorist gone? The Behavior Therapist, 17, 20–21.Google Scholar
  6. Staats, A. W. (1993a). Personality theory, abnormal psychology, and psychological measurement. Behavior Modification, 17, 8–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Staats, A. W. (1993b). Why do we need another behaviorism (such as paradigmatic behaviorism)? The Behavior Therapist, 16, 64–68.Google Scholar
  8. Staats, A. W. (1994a). Psychological behaviorism and behaviorizing psychology. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 93–114.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Staats, A. W. (1994b). Second-generation behaviorism short-changes behavior therapy. The Behavior Therapist, 17, 18–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations