In his effort to distinguish operant from respondent conditioning, Skinner stressed the lack of an eliciting stimulus and rejected the prevailing stereotype of Pavlovian “stimulus-response” psychology. But control by antecedent stimuli, whether classified as conditional or discriminative, is ubiquitous in the natural setting. With both respondent and operant behavior, symmetrical gradients of generalization along unrelated dimensions may be obtained following differential reinforcement in the presence and the absence of the stimulus. The slopes of these gradients serve as measures of stimulus control, and they can be steepened without applying differential reinforcement to any two points along the test dimension. Increases and decreases in stimulus control occur under the same conditions as those leading to increases and decreases in observing responses, indicating that it is the increasing frequency and duration of observation (and perhaps also of attention) that produces the separation in performances during discrimination learning.
Key wordsstimulus discrimination generalization gradients observing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dinsmoor, J. A., Flint, G. A., Smith, R. F., & Viemeister, N. F. (1969). Differential reinforcing effects of stimuli associated with the presence or absence of a schedule of punishment. In D. P. Hendry (Ed.), Conditioned reinforcement (pp. 357–384). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
- Dinsmoor, J. A., Thiels, E., Lee, D. M., Pfister, J., & Dougan, J. D. (1989). Selective observing: Pigeons turn discriminative stimuli on and off by pecking separate keys. In N. W. Bond & D. A. T. Siddle (Eds.), Proceedings, XXIVth International Congress of Psychology: Vol. 6. Psychobiology: Issues and applications (pp. 443–456). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Fantino, E. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. In W. K. Honig & J. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 313–339). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Hearst, E. (1969). Excitation, inhibition and discrimination learning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 1–41). Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University Press.Google Scholar
- Hearst, E. (1975). The classical-instrumental distinction: Reflexes, voluntary behavior, and categories of associative learning. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Vol. 2. Conditioning and behavior theory (pp. 181–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Pavlov, I. P. (1960). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1927)Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1972). Cumulative record: A selection of papers (3rd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, N. S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Wyckoff, L. B. (1969). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. In D. P. Hendry (Ed.), Conditioned reinforcement (pp. 237–250). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar