The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 231–232 | Cite as

Reply to Harrison: The Representative Method

  • Iver H. Iversen


  1. Burdick, C. K. (1979). The effect of behavioral paradigm on auditory discrimination learning: A literature review. Journal of Auditory Research, 19, 59–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Harrison, J. M. (1994). The representative animal. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 207–219.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Henton, W. W., & Iversen, I. H. (1978). Classical conditioning and operant conditioning: A response pattern analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain: An interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lawicka, W. (1964). The role of stimuli modality in successive discrimination and differentiation learning. Bulletin of the Academy of Polish Sciences, 12, 35–38.Google Scholar
  6. Neill, J. C., & Harrison, J. M. (1987). Auditory discrimination: The Konorski quality-location effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 81–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Seligman, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77, 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shettleworth, S. J. (1979). Constraints on conditioning in the writings of Konorski. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation (pp. 399–416). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iver H. Iversen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North FloridaJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations