Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 221–223 | Cite as

Common Versus Distinctive Species: On the Logic of Behavioral Comparison

  • Edward A. Wasserman
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Harrison, J. M. (1994). The representative animal. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 207–219.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Wasserman, E. A. (1981). Response evocation in autoshaping: Contributions of cognitive and comparative-evolutionary analyses to an understanding of directed action. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 21–54). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Wasserman, E. A. (1986). Prospection and retrospection as processes of animal short-term memory. In D. F. Kendrick, M. Rilling, & M. R. Denny (Eds.), Animal memory (pp. 53–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Comparative cognition: Beginning the second century of the study of animal intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Wasserman, E. A., & Astley, S. L. (1994). A behavioral analysis of concepts: Its application to pigeons and children. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 73–132). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward A. Wasserman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations