The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 255–268 | Cite as

Mechanism and Contextualism in Behavior Analysis: Just Some Observations

  • Edward K. Morris
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer, D. M. (1993). On Morris’s mechanisms. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 45–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Balsam, P. D., & Tomie, A. (Eds.). (1985). Context and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Batts, B., & Crawford, L. L. (1991). Problematic progress: A review of Laudan’s Progress and Its Problems and Science and Values. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 337–349.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackman, D. E. (1991). B. F. Skinner and G. H. Mead: On biological science and social science. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 251–265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Branch, M. N. (1977). On the role of “memory” in the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 28, 171–179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, E. G. (1993). Behavior analysis is not ultimately about behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 47–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Catania, A. C. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Chiesa, M. (1992). Radical behaviorism and scientific frameworks: From mechanistic to relational accounts. American Psychologist, 47, 1287–1299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman, S. R. (1984). Background and change in Skinner’s metatheory from 1930 to 1938. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 471–500.Google Scholar
  11. Costall, A., & Still, A. (Eds.). (1987). Cognitive psychology in question. Hempstead, England: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  12. Day, W. F. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delprato, D. J. (1993). Behavior analysis and S. C. Pepper’s other mechanism. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 51–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Delprato, D. J., & Midgley, B. D. (1992). Some fundamentals of B. F. Skinner’s behaviorism. American Psychologist, 47, 1507–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1931). Context and thought. University of California Publications in Philosophy, 12, 203–224.Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1939). Experience, knowledge and value: A rejoinder. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of John Dewey (pp. 517–608). New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1966). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1938)Google Scholar
  20. Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillespie, D. (1992). The mind’s we: Contextualism in cognitive psychology. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hackenberg, T. D. (1988). Operationism, mechanism, and psychological reality: The second coming of linguistic relativity. The Psychological Record, 38, 187–201.Google Scholar
  23. Hayes, L. J. (1992). The psychological present. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 139–145.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., Reese, H. W., & Sarbin, T. R. (1993). Varieties of scientific contextualism. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hineline, P. N. (1990). The origins of organism-based psychological theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 305–320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Houts, A. C. (1991). The contextualist turn in empirical social science: Epistemological issues, methodological implications, and adjusted expectations. In R. Cohen & A. W. Siegel (Eds.), Context and development (pp. 25–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Kantor, J. R. (1946). The aim and progress of psychology. American Scientist, 34, 251–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kantor, J. R. (1953). The logic of modern science. Chicago: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  31. Krechevsky, I. (1939). Review of Skinner’s The Behavior of Organisms. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34, 404–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laird, J. (1929). Concerning epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 30, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, V. E. (1993). Beyond the illusion of a mechanistic psychology. The Behavior Analyst, 76, 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Mahoney, M. J. (1989). Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism: Important distinctions between scientism and objectivism. American Psychologist, 44, 1372–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mancuso, J. C. (1993). Personal construct systems in the context of action. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 111–133). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mandell, C. (1986). Putting learning back in context: A review of Balsam and Tomie’s Context and Learning. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 205–210.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Marr, M. J. (1993). Contextualistic mechanism or mechanistic contextualism?: The straw machine as tar baby. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 59–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between the discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Midgley, B. D., & Morris, E. K. (1988). The integrated field: An alternative to the behavior-analytic conceptualization of behavioral units. The Psychological Record, 38, 483–500.Google Scholar
  41. Midgley, B. D., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Nature = f(nurture): A review of Oyama’s The Ontogeny of Information. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 229–240.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Morris, E. K. (1982). Some relationships between interbehavioral psychology and radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 10, 187–216.Google Scholar
  43. Morris, E. K. (1988a). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 289–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morris, E. K. (1988b). [Review of Contextualism and Understanding in Behavioral Science]. The Psychological Record, 38, 363–367.Google Scholar
  45. Morris, E. K. (1989). Questioning psychology’s mechanism: A review of Costall and Still’s Cognitive Psychology in Question. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 59–67.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Morris, E. K. (1990). What Mahoney “knows.” American Psychologist, 45, 1178–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morris, E. K. (1991). The contextualism that is behavior analysis: An alternative to cognitive psychology. In A. Still & A. Costall (Eds.), Against cognitivism: Alternative foundations for cognitive psychology (pp. 123–149). Hempstead, England: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  48. Morris, E. K. (1992a). The aim, progress, and evolution of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 3–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Morris, E. K. (1992b, May). The concept of context in the conceptual analysis of behavior. In E. K. Morris (Chair), The concept of context in the description of behavior. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  50. Morris, E. K. (1992c, May). The generic nature of the concept of context. In E. K. Morris (Chair), The concept of context in the description of behavior. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  51. Morris, E. K. (1993a). Behavior analysis and mechanism: One is not the other. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 25–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Morris, E. K. (1993b). Contextualism, historiography, and the history of behavior analysis. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 137–165). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  53. Morris, E. K., Higgins, S. T., & Bickel, W. K. (1982). Some comments on cognitive science in the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 109–125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Morris, E. K., & Peterson, P. (1993, May). On context and contextualism: An important distinction. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  55. Moxley, R. (1982). Graphics for the three-term contingency. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 45–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Moxley, R. (1984). Graphic discriminations for radical functional behaviorism. Behaviorism, 12, 81–95.Google Scholar
  57. Moxley, R. (1987). Three conceptual units of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 17–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Moxley, R. (1992). From mechanistic to functional behaviorism. American Psychologist, 47, 1300–1311.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Pepper, S. C. (1932). How to look at causality—An example of philosophic method. University of California Publications in Philosophy, 15, 179–203.Google Scholar
  60. Pepper, S. C. (1934). The conceptual framework of Tolman’s purposive behaviorism. Psychological Review, 41, 108–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pepper, S. C. (1939). Some questions on Dewey’s esthetics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of John Dewey (pp. 370–389). New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
  62. Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  63. Pepper, S. C. (1973). Metaphor in philosophy. In P. P. Weiner (Ed.), Dictionary of the history of ideas: Studies of selected pivotal ideas (Vol. 3, pp. 196–201). New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  64. Pronko, N. H., & Herman, D. T. (1982). From Dewey’s reflex arc concept to transactionalism and beyond. Behaviorism, 10, 229–254.Google Scholar
  65. Reber, A. S. (1985). The Penguin dictionary of psychology. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  66. Reese, H. W. (1993). Comments about Morris’s paper. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 67–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Reese, H. W., & Overton, W. F. (1970). Models of development and theories of development. In L. R. Goulet & R. B. Baltes (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp. 116–145). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  68. Rosnow, R. L., & Georgoudi, M. (Eds.). (1986). Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  69. Sarbin, T. R. (1973). Contextualism: The world view of modern psychology. In A. W. Landfield (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 1–41). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sarbin, T. R. (1993). The narrative as the root metaphor for contextualism. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 51–65). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  71. Savery, W. (1939). The significance of Dewey’s philosophy. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of John Dewey (pp. 481–513). New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
  72. Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.). (1939). The philosophy of John Dewey. New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
  73. Schraff, J. L. (1982). Skinner’s concept of the operant: From necessitarian to probabilistic causality. Behaviorism, 10, 45–54.Google Scholar
  74. Skinner, B. F. (1930). On the conditions of elicitation of certain eating reflexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 16, 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Skinner, B. F. (1931). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 427–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Skinner, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. Journal of General Psychology, 12, 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  78. Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277, 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Skinner, B. F. (1947). Current trends in experimental psychology. In W. Dennis (Ed.), Current trends in psychology (pp. 16–49). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  82. Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  85. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  86. Skinner, B. F. (1979). The making of a behaviorist. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  87. Skinner, B. F. (1980). The experimental analysis of operant behavior: A history. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 191–202). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Skinner, B. F. (1987). [Review of Behaviorism and Logical Positivism]. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 23, 206–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism: A reassessment of the alliance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Thompson, T. (1984). The examining magistrate for nature [Retrospective review of C. Bernard, An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine]. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 211–221.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Case histories in the great power of steady misrepresentation. American Psychologist, 47, 1441–1453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century.Google Scholar
  94. Tolman, E. C. (1938). Determiners of behavior at a choice point. Psychological Review, 45, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tolman, E. C. (1949). Discussion (from Interrelationships between perception and personality: A symposium). Journal of Personality, 18, 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Verplanck, W. S. (1954). Burrhus F. Skinner. In W. K. Estes, S. Koch, K. MacCorquodale, P. E. Meehl, C. G. Mueller, W. N. Schoenfeld, & W. S. Verplanck. Modem learning theory (pp. 267–316). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  97. Zuriff, G. E. (1980). Radical behaviorist epistemology. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward K. Morris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Development, Dole Human Development CenterUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations