The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 211–214 | Cite as

The Application of Establishing Operations

  • Mark L. Sundberg
Article

Conclusion

The EO is a powerful independent variable and can be manipulated to change a variety of human behaviors. It is possible that further research on the EO could lead to many theoretical and practical improvements in behavior analysis. Michael’s classification system of the different types of EOs serves as a guide for research, and for ways to incorporate the EO into typical functional analyses and behavior intervention programs. Michael’s refinement of the EO concept will facilitate this important development in our field.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carroll, R. J., & Hesse, B. E. (1987). The effects of alternating mand and tact training on the acquisition of tacts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 55–65.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Lamarre, J., & Holland, J. G. (1985). The functional independence of mands and tacts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 5–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. McPherson, A., & Osborne, J. G. (1988). Control by an establishing stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 213–227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael, J. (1988). The establishing operation and the mand. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 3–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Pierce, W. D., Epling, W. F., & Boer, D. P. (1986). Deprivation and satiation: The interrelations between food and wheel turning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 199–210.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sigafoos, J., Reichle, J., Doss, S., Hall, K., & Pettitt, L. (1990). “Spontaneous” transfer of stimulus control from mand to tact contingencies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 165–176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  11. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching language to the developmentally disabled. Prince George, BC: College of New Caledonia Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sundberg, M. L. (1991). 301 research topics from Skinner’s book Verbal Behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 81–96.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Sundberg, M. L., San Juan, B., Dawdy, M., & Arguelles, M. (1990). The acquisition of tacts, mands, and intraverbals by individuals with traumatic brain injury. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 83–99.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark L. Sundberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavior Analysts, Inc.DanvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations