Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 191–206 | Cite as

Establishing Operations

  • Jack Michael
Article

Abstract

The first two books on behavior analysis (Skinner, 1938; Keller & Schoenfeld, 1950) had chapter-length coverage of motivation. The next generation of texts also had chapters on the topic, but by the late 1960s it was no longer being given much treatment in the behavior-analytic literature. The present failure to deal with the topic leaves a gap in our understanding of operant functional relations. A partial solution is to reintroduce the concept of the establishing operation, defined as an environmental event, operation, or stimulus condition that affects an organism by momentarily altering (a) the reinforcing effectiveness of other events and (b) the frequency of occurrence of that part of the organism’s repertoire relevant to those events as consequences. Discriminative and motivative variables can be distinguished as follows: The former are related to the differential availability of an effective form of reinforcement given a particular type of behavior; the latter are related to the differential reinforcing effectiveness of environmental events. An important distinction can also be made between unconditioned establishing operations (UEOs), such as food deprivation and painful stimulation, and conditioned establishing operations (CEOs) that depend on the learning history of the organism. One type of CEO is a stimulus that has simply been paired with a UEO and as a result may take on some of the motivative properties of that UEO. The warning stimulus in avoidance procedures is another important type of CEO referred to as reflexive because it establishes its own termination as a form of reinforcement and evokes the behavior that has accomplished such termination. Another CEO is closely related to the concept of conditional conditioned reinforcement and is referred to as a transitive CEO, because it establishes some other stimulus as a form of effective reinforcement and evokes the behavior that has produced that other stimulus. The multiple control of human behavior is very common, and is often quite complex. An understanding of unlearned and learned establishing operations can contribute to our ability to identify and control the various components of such multiple determination.

Keywords

establishing operations motivation multiple control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alling, K. (1991). The effects of a conditioned establishing operation on performance of a two-component chain. Unpublished master’s thesis. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, D. J. (1990). Of carrots and sticks: A review of Deci and Ryan’s Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 323–332.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Calvin, J. S., Bicknell, E. A., & Sperling, D. S. (1953). Establishment of a conditioned drive based on the hunger drive. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 46, 173–175.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Catania, A. C. (1979). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C. (1984). Learning (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Collier, G., Hirsch, E., & Kanarek, R. (1977). The operant revisited. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 28–52). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Cravens, R., & Renner, K. E. (1970). Conditioned appetitive drive states: Empirical evidence and theoretical status. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 212–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. D’Amato, M. R., Fazzaro, J., & Etkin, M. (1968). Anticipatory responding and avoidance discrimination as factors in avoidance conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 41–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickinson, A. M. (1989). The detrimental effects of extrinsic reinforcement on intrinsic motivation. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 1–15.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Fantino, E., & Logan, C. A. (1979). The experimental analysis of behavior. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  12. Farris, H. E., Gideon, B. E., & Ulrich, R. E. (1970). Classical conditioning of aggression: A developmental study. The Psychological Record, 20, 63–67.Google Scholar
  13. Finkelstein, N. W., & Ramey, C. T. (1977). Learning to control the environment in infancy. Child Development, 48, 806–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holland, J. G., & Skinner, B. F. (1961). The analysis of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Honig, W. K. (1966). Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  16. Honig, W. K., & Staddon, J. E. R. (Eds.). (1977). Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Kalnins, I. V., & Bruner, J. S. (1973). The coordination of visual observation and instrumental behavior in early infancy. Perception, 2, 307–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kantor, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology. Granville, OH: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  19. Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  20. Lundin, R. W. (1961). Personality, an experimental analysis. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lundin, R. W. (1969). Personality, a behavioral analysis. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  22. Mazur, J. E. (1986). Learning and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Mazur, J. E. (1990). Learning and behavior (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  24. McKirdy, L. S., & Rovee, C. K. (1978). The reinforcing efficacy of visual and auditory components in infant conjugate conditioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 80–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McPherson, A., & Osborne, J. G. (1986). The emergence of establishing stimulus control. The Psychological Record, 36, 375–386.Google Scholar
  26. McPherson, A., & Osborne, J. G. (1988). Control of behavior by an establishing stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 213–227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Michael, J. (1983). Evocative and repertoire-altering effects of an environmental event. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2, 19–21.Google Scholar
  29. Michael, J. (1988). Establishing operations and the mand. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 3–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Millenson, J. R. (1967). Principles of behavioral analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Millenson, J. R., & Leslie, J. C. (1979). Principles of behavioral analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, N. E. (1951). Learnable drives and rewards. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 435–472). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  33. Mineka, S. (1975). Some new perspectives on conditioned hunger. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 104, 143–148.Google Scholar
  34. Morris, E. K., Higgins, S. T., & Bickel, W. K. (1982). The influence of Kantor’s interbehavioral psychology on behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 159–173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Powers, R. B., & Osborne, J. G. (1976). Fundamentals of behavior. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
  36. Rovee, C. K., & Fagen, J. W. (1976). Extended conditioning and 24-hour retention in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 21, 1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  38. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  39. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  41. Staats, A. W. (1963). Complex human behavior (with contributions by C. K. Staats). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  42. Teitelbaum, P. (1966). The use of operant methods in the assessment and control of motivational states. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 565–608). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  43. Teitelbaum, P. (1977). Levels of integration of the operant. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 7–27). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Ulrich, R. E., & Azrin, N. H. (1962). Reflexive fighting in response to aversive stimulation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 511–520.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Watson, J. S. (1967). Memory and contingency analysis in infant learning. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 13, 55–76.Google Scholar
  46. Watson, J. S., & Ramey, C. T. (1972). Reactions to response-contingent stimulation in early infancy. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 219–227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack Michael
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations