Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Separating Discriminative and Function-Altering Effects of Verbal Stimuli

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ever since Skinner’s first discussion of rule-governed behavior, behavior analysts have continued to define rules, either explicitly or implicitly, as verbal discriminative stimuli. Consequently, it is not difficult to find, in the literature on rule-governed behavior, references to stimulus control, antecedent control, or to rules occasioning behavior. However, some verbal stimuli have effects on behavior that are not easily described as discriminative. Such stimuli don’t evoke behavior as discriminative stimuli, but rather alter the functions of other stimuli in a manner analogous to operant and respondent conditioning. Hence, this type of control has been called function altering. Any known stimulus function (e.g., evocative, or [conditioned] reinforcing or punishing functions) can apparently be altered by such function-altering stimuli. Describing these stimuli as discriminative stimuli obscures their possible function-altering effects and consequently may retard inquiry into them. This paper encourages behavior analysts to begin separating the discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli and suggests that by doing so, behavior analysts may better understand what may be most unique about these stimuli. Results from several experiments, especially those in which children served as subjects, are analyzed. Finally, some speculations are offered concerning the genesis of function-altering stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi, G. (1992). Models of proximate and ultimate causation in psychology. The American Psychologist, 47, 1359–1370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1964). Reinforcement and instructions with mental patients. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 327–331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Detrich, R., & Weninger, J. M. (1988). On the functional role of the verbalization in correspondence training procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 345–356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., & Galizio, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, G. A., & Schlinger, H. (1990). Performance of children under a multiple random-ratio random-interval schedule of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 263–271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, E., & Schlinger, H. (1987). Rules: Function-altering contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 183–187.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boren, J. J., & Devine, D. D. (1968). The repeated acquisition of behavioral chains. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 651–660.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Braam, C., & Malott, R. W. (1990). “I’ll do it when the snow melts”: The effects of deadlines and delayed outcomes on rule-governed behavior in preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 67–76.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 1–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownstein, A. J., & Shull, R. L. (1985). A rule for the use of the term, “Rule-governed behavior.” The Behavior Analyst, 8, 265–267.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buskist, W. F., Bennett, R. H., & Miller, H. L. (1981). Effects of instructional constraints on human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1990). Properties of rule-governed behavior and their implications. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 215–230). Hove, England: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti, D. T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259–276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danforth, J. S., Chase, P. N., Dolan, M., & Joyce, J. H. (1990). The establishment of stimulus control by instructions and by differential reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, J. R., & Konarski, E. A. (1987). Correspondence training: An example of rule-governed behavior? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 391–400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Devaney, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog–Verbal reports and the analysis of rules. A review of Ericson and Simon’s Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351–363.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Hayes, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119–137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Malott, R. W. (1989). The achievement of evasive goals: Control by rules describing contingencies that are not direct acting. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 269–322). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453–467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1980). The discriminative stimulus or SD. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 47–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1983). Evocative and repertoire-altering effects of an environmental event. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2, 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 1–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1986). Repertoire-altering effects of remote contingencies. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 10–18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mistr, K. (1992). The evocative and repertoire-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of North Texas, Denton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (1991). A behavioral interpretation of memory. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 261–279). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C., & Donahoe, J. W. (1992). Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1344–1358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pouthas, V., Droit, S., Jacquet, A.-Y., & Wearden, J. H. (1990). Temporal differentiation of response duration in children of different ages: Developmental changes in verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 21–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D. (1990). A reply to behavior analysts writing about rules and rule-governed behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 77–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D. (1992). Theory in behavior analysis: An application to child development. American Psychologist. 47, 1396–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H., & Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 41–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D., Blakely, E., Fillhard, J., & Poling, A. (1991). Defining terms in behavior analysis: Reinforcer and discriminative stimulus. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 153–161.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem-solving. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 225–257). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. E. (1985). Repeated acquisition in the analysis of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulfert, E., Dougher, M. J., & Greenway, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. D. (1986). Behavioral units: A historical introduction. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 1–12). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Western New England College, Box 2227, Springfield, MA, 01119, USA

    Henry D. Schlinger Jr.

Authors
  1. Henry D. Schlinger Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlinger, H.D. Separating Discriminative and Function-Altering Effects of Verbal Stimuli. BEHAV ANALYST 16, 9–23 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392605

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392605

Key words

Search

Navigation