The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 179–182 | Cite as

A Suggestion for Describing Combinations of Response-Dependent and Response-Independent Events

  • Abdulrazaq A. Imam
  • Kennon A. Lattal
On Terms

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L., & Lattal, K. A. (1987). A role for negative reinforcement of response omission in punishment? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 407–416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Azrin, N. H. (1956). Effects of two intermittent schedules of immediate and nonimmediate punishment. Journal of Psychology, 42, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, R. A., Shull, R. L., & Brownstein, A. J. (1975). Time allocation on concurrent schedules with asymmetrical response requirements. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 53–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgess, I. S., & Wearden, J. H. (1986). Super-imposition of response-independent reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 75–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C. (1991). Glossary. In I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Techniques in the behavioral and neural sciences: Experimental analysis of behavior (Part 2, pp. G1–G44). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Catania, A. C., Deegan, J. F., & Cook, L. (1966). Concurrent fixed-ratio and avoidance responding in the squirrel monkey. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, D. DeA., Peeke, V., & Wolfe, F. (1970). Independently delivered food decelerates fixed-ratio rates. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 301–307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Findley, J. D. (1958). Preference and switching under concurrent scheduling. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 123–144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Heimstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental A nalysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hineline, P. N. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: Its community, its functions, and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.Google Scholar
  12. Imam, A. A., & Lattal, K. A. (1988). Sources of alternative reinforcement: A reevaluation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 261–271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Lattal, K. A., & Bryan, A. J. (1976). Effects of concurrent response-independent einforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 495–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Lattal, K. A., & Poling, A. D. (1981). Describing response-event relations: Babel revisited. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 143–152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Marr, M. J., & Zeiler, M. D. (1974). Schedules of response-independent conditioned reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 433–444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Morse, W. H. (1966). Intermittent reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 52–108). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  17. Nevin, J. A. (1974). Response strength in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 389–408.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Rachlin, H. L., & Baum, W. M. (1972). Alternative reinforcement: Does the source matter? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 231–241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Random House dictionary of the English language. (1971). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Reynolds, G. S. (1968). A primer of operant conditioning. New York: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
  21. Schoenfeld, W. N., & Cole, B. K. (1975). What is a “schedule of reinforcement”? Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 10, 52–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shimp, C. P. (1973). Synthetic variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19, 311–330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sidman, M., Herrnstein, R. J., & Conrad, D. G. (1957). Maintenance of avoidance behavior by unavoidable shocks. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50, 553–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Skinner, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Staddon, J. E. R., & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971). The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Timberlake, W., & Lucas, G. A. (1985). The basis of superstitious behavior: Chance contingency, stimulus substitution, or appetitive behavior? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 279–299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeiler, M. D. (1976). Positive reinforcement and the elimination of reinforced responses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 37–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeiler, M. D. (1977a). Elimination of reinforced behavior: Intermittent schedules of not-responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 23–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Zeiler, M. D. (1977b). Schedules of reinforcement: The controlling variables. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 201–232). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Zeiler, M. D., & Blakely, T. F. (1983). Choice between response units: The rate constancy model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 275–291.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdulrazaq A. Imam
    • 1
  • Kennon A. Lattal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations