The present paper compares behavior-analytic and cognitive treatments of the concept of psychological history with regard to its role in current action. Both treatments take the position that the past bears some responsibility for the present, and are thereby obligated to find a means of actualizing the past in the present. Both do so by arguing that the past is brought to bear in the present via the organism. Although the arguments of the two positions differ on this issue, neither provides a complete account. An unconventional treatment of psychological history is proposed, the logic of which is exemplified in anthropological, biological, and psychological perspectives. The unconventional treatment in psychological perspective holds that (a) the organism’s interaction with its environment, not the organism itself, changes with experience; and (b) the past interactions of an organism exist as, and only as, the present interactions of that organism. This solution to the problem of psychological history provides obligations and opportunities for analysis that are not available when the more conventional positions of cognitivism and behavior analysis are adopted.
Key wordspsychological history history of reinforcement memory storage
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Atkinson, R. C., & Shriffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kantor, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology. Chicago: The Principia Press.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Schank, R. C., & Farrell, R. G. (1988). Memory. In M. F. McTear (Ed.), Understanding cognitive science (pp. 120–133). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Shadbot, N. E. (1988). Models and methods in cognitive science. In M. F. McTear (Ed.), Understanding cognitive science (pp. 23–45). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sharkey, N. E. (1988). Neural network learning techniques. In M. F. McTear (Ed.), Understanding cognitive science (pp. 157–180). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Shoben, E. J. (1988). The representation of knowledge. In M. F. McTear (Ed.), Understanding cognitive science (pp. 102–119). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1978). Why I am not a cognitive psychologist. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Reflections on behaviorism and society (pp. 97–112). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1985). Cognitive science and behaviorism. Reprinted in R. P. Honeck, T. J. S. Case, & M. J. Firment (Eds.), Introductory readings for cognitive psychology (pp. 33–44). Guilford, CT: Dushkin.Google Scholar
- Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar