The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 225–228 | Cite as

Should Behavior Analysts Accept Imam’s Sense of Teleology?

  • Roy A. Moxley
In Response

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L., & Emery, F. E. (1972). On purposeful systems. Chicago, Aldine Atherton.Google Scholar
  2. Ayala, F. J. (1970). Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. Philosophy of Science, 37, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckner, M. (1968). The biological way of thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bonnette, D. (1972). Aquinas’ proofs for God’s existence. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braithwaite, R. B. (1955). Scientific explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cannon, W. B. (1945). The way of an investigator. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Charlton, W. (1970). Aristotle’s physics: Books I and II (translated with introduction and notes by W. Charlton). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Churchman, C. W., & Ackoff, R. L. (1950). Purposive behavior and cybernetics. Social Forces, 29, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Day, W. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. The Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffore, R. (1978). Toward an Aristotelian analysis of causation in psychological research. The Psychological Record, 28, 181–185.Google Scholar
  12. Guthrie, E. R. (1924). Purpose and mechanism in psychology. The Journal of Philosophy, 21, 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guthrie, E. R. (1960). The psychology of learning (rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  14. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core [A review of Stephen Pepper’s World hypotheses]. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hull, C. L. (1930). Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanisms. The Psychological Review, 37, 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  17. Imam, A. A. (1989). Misconstruing behavioral consequences: Teleology or teleonomy. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 81–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. James, W. (1879). Are we automata? Mind, 4, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitchener, R. F. (1977). Behavior and behaviorism. Behaviorism, 5, 11–71.Google Scholar
  20. Kuo, Z. Y. (1928). The fundamental error of the concept of purpose and the trial and error fallacy. The Psychological Review, 35, 414–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamal, P. A. (1983). A cogent critique of epistemology leaves radical behaviorism unscathed. Behaviorism, 11, 103–108.Google Scholar
  22. Lashley, K. S. (1923). The behavioristic interpretation of consciousness. The Psychological Review, 30, 237–272, 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mayr, E. (1965). Cause and effect in biology. In D. Lerner (Ed.), Cause and effect (pp. 33–50). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mayr, O. (1986). Authority, liberty & automatic machinery in early modern Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mead, G. H. (1936). Movements of thought in the nineteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Moore, J. (1984). On behaviorism, knowledge, and causal explanation. The Psychological Record, 34, 73–97.Google Scholar
  27. Moore, O. K., & Lewis, D. J. (1953). Purpose and learning theory. Psychological Review, 60, 149–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Morris, E. K. (1988). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 289–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris, G. S. (1875). The final cause as principle of cognition and principle in nature. London: Robert Hardwicke.Google Scholar
  30. Nagel, E. (1979). Teleology revisited and other essays in the philosophy and history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Peirce, C. S. (1960). In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Peirce (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Reese, H. W. (1986). Behavioral and dialectical psychologies. In L. W. Litsitt & J. H. Cantor (Eds.), Experimental child psychologist: Essays and experiments in honor of Charles C. Spiker (pp. 157–195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Ringen, J. (1976). Explanation, teleology, and operant behaviorism. Philosophy of Science, 43, 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosnow, R. L., & Georgoudi, M. (Eds.). (1986). Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  37. Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C. (Eds.). (1989). The Oxford English dictionary (2nd ed., Vol. 17). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Singer, E. A. (1924). Mind as behavior. Columbus, OH: Adams.Google Scholar
  39. Singer, E. A. (1946). Mechanism, vitalism, naturalism. Philosophy of Science, 13, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  42. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Staddon, J. E. R. (1983). Adaptive behavior and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, C. (1964). The explanation of behaviour. New York: The Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thoradike, E. L. (1969). Human nature and the social order (G. J. Clifford, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1940)Google Scholar
  46. Weiss, A. P. (1929). A theoretical basis of human behavior. Columbus, OH: Adams.Google Scholar
  47. Wright, L. (1976). Teleological explanations: An etiological analysis of goals and functions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy A. Moxley
    • 1
  1. 1.West Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations