Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 219–224 | Cite as

Are Moral Considerations Sufficient for Selecting Nonaversive Interventions?: A Review of Repp and Singh’s Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities

  • Paul Alberto
  • Donna Andrews
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azrin, N., & Holtz, W. (1966). Punishment. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 213–270). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  2. Horner, R., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R., Carr, E., Sailor, W., Anderson, J., Albin, R., & O’Neill, R. (1990). Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 125–132.Google Scholar
  3. Repp, A. C., & Singh, N. N. (Eds.). (1990). Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Simpson, R. (1991). Editor’s note. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 6, 1.Google Scholar
  5. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. (1986). Resolution on the Cessation of Intrusive Interventions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Alberto
    • 1
  • Donna Andrews
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations