The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 197–206 | Cite as

Aversives, Fundamental Rights and the Courts

  • Robert A. Sherman
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behavior Research Institute, Inc., et al. v. Leonard, Bristol County (Mass.) Probate and Family Court, No. 86E0018-GI (1986).Google Scholar
  2. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc., 398 Mass. 179 (1986).Google Scholar
  3. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.Google Scholar
  4. Greenblatt, M. (1974). Class action and the right to treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 25, 449–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
  6. Herr, S. S., Arons, S., & Wallace, R. E. (1983). Legal rights and mental health care. Lexington, MA: P.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
  7. In re Northville Public Schools and Wayne-Westland Public Schools, 16 EHLR 847 (1990).Google Scholar
  8. In re Quinlan, 70 N.J. 10 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. Kate’ School v. Department of Health, 156 Cal. Rptr. 529 (Court of Appeals, 1979).Google Scholar
  10. Knecht v. Gillman, 488 F.2d 1136 (8th Cir. 1973).Google Scholar
  11. Landau, R. J. (1990, August). Legal issues surrounding the use of contingent electrical stimulation in a public school setting. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Service Act, California Welfare & Institutions Code §4500, et seq.Google Scholar
  13. LaVigna, G. W., & Donnellan, A. M. (1986). Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  14. Lelsz v. Kavanaugh, 673 F. Supp. 828 (N.D. Texas); appealed on other grounds, 807 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1987).Google Scholar
  15. Linscheid, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Ricketts, R. W., Williams, D. E., & Griffin, J. C. (1990). Clinical evaluation of the self-injurious behavior inhibiting device (SIBIS). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 53–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mackey v. Procunier, 477 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1973).Google Scholar
  17. Mill, J. S. (1952). On liberty. In R. Hutchins (Ed.), The great books of the western world, 43. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  18. Price v. Sheppard, 239 N.W.2d 905 (Minn. 1976).Google Scholar
  19. Punishing the retarded (1989, October 2). U.S. News & World Report, p. 71.Google Scholar
  20. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
  21. Rogers v. Okin, 478 F. Supp. 1342 (D. Mass. 1979), aff’d. in part, rev’d in part, 634 F.2d 650 (1st Cir. 1980), vacated and remanded sub nom Mills v. Rogers, 102 S.Ct. 2442 (1982).Google Scholar
  22. Singer, B. F. (1970). Psychological studies of punishment, California Law Review 58, 405, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Superintendent of Belchertown v. Saikewicz, 373 Mass. 728 (1977).Google Scholar
  24. Union Pacific Railway v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250 (1891).Google Scholar
  25. Washington v. Harper, 110 S.Ct. 1028 (1990).Google Scholar
  26. Van Duser V. Intermediate School Board of the Intermediate School District of the County of Genesee, U.S. District Court, E.D. Michigan, 89-CV-40289 FL (1989).Google Scholar
  27. Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Sherman
    • 1
  1. 1.Gaffin & Krattenmaker, P.C.BostonUSA

Personalised recommendations