Abstract
In what seems to be a response to a paper by Skinner (1987), Mahoney (1989) provides evidence of unfamiliarity with and intellectual intolerance toward radical behaviorism by presenting a critique of it that includes a variety of improper and counterfactual attributions. For example, he argues that radical behaviorism is Cartesian rather than Baconian when the historical record shows the opposite, that it is fundamentally associationist when in fact it is selectionist, and that its philosophy of science is essentially that of operationalism and logical positivism when instead it moved on to other criteria decades ago. The details of Mahoney’s history are sometimes flawed and sometimes unsubstantiated, as when he provides a distorted account of the origins of the Association for Behavior Analysis or when he makes undocumented claims about the banning of books. On examination, many of his arguments are couched in stylistic terms that share their rhetorical features with racial, ethnic, and religious stereotyping.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1968). Autoshaping of the pigeon’s key-peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 1–8.
Catania, A. C. (1982). Antimisrepresentationalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 374–375.
Catania, A. C. (1987). Some Darwinian lessons for behavior analysis [A review of Peter J. Bowler’s The eclipse of Darwinism]. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 249–257.
Catania, A. C., & Harnad, S. (Eds.). (1988). The selection of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1959). [Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behavior]. Language, 35, 26–58.
Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.
Czubaroff, J. (1988). Criticism and response in the Skinner controversies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 321–329.
Darwin, C. (1962). On the origin of species (6th ed.). New York: Collier Books. (Original work published 1872.)
Darwin, F. (Ed.). (1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin and selected letters. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1892.)
Dinsmoor, J. A. (1979). A note on the historical record: MPA and MABA. The Behavior Analyst, 2(1), 23–24.
Garcia, J. (1981). Tilting at the paper mills of academe. American Psychologist, 36, 149–158.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1977a). The evolution of behaviorism. American Psychologist, 32, 593–603.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1977b). Doing what comes naturally: A reply to Professor Skinner. American Psychologist, 32, 1013–1016.
Lubinski, D., & Thompson, T. (1987). An animal model of the interpersonal communication of interoceptive (private) states. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 1–15.
MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 83–99.
Mahoney, M. J. (1989). Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism. American Psychologist, 44, 1372–1377.
Mermin, N. D. (1989, April). What’s wrong with this pillow? Physics Today, pp. 9–10.
Neuringer, A. (1986). Can people behave “randomly?”: The role of feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 62–75.
Page, S., & Neuringer, A. (1985). Variability is an operant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 429–452.
Peterson, M. E. (1978). The Midwestern Association of Behavior Analysis: Past, present, future. The Behavior Analyst, 1, 3–15.
Provine, R. R. (1988). A hierarchy of developmental contingencies [A review of Purvis and Lichtman’s Principles of neural development]. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 565–569.
Rachlin, H. (1970). An introduction to modern behaviorism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Sherrard, C. (1988). Rhetorical weapons: Chomsky’s attack on Skinner. Educational Psychology, 8, 197–205.
Shimp, C. P. (1989). Contemporary behaviorism versus the old behavioral straw man in Gardner’s The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 163–171.
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 42, 270–277.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 140, 951–958.
Skinner, B. F. (1966). The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Science, 153, 1205–1213.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1976). Particulars of my life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1977). Herrnstein and the evolution of behaviorism. American Psychologist, 32, 1006–1012.
Skinner, B. F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42, 780–786.
Skinner, B. F. (1988a). Postscript. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior (pp. 162–164). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1988b). Skinner’s reply to Catania. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior (pp. 483–488). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1988c). Skinner’s reply to Shimp. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior (pp. 140–141). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1988d). Skinner’s reply to Wassermann. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior (pp. 460–461). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Smith, T. L. (1986). Biology as allegory [A review of Elliot Sober’s The nature of selection]. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 105–112.
Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (1983). Misconceptions and miseducation: Presentations of radical behaviorism in psychology textbooks. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 153–160.
Williams, D. R., & Williams, H. (1969). Automaintenance in the pigeon: Sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 511–520.
References
Lonigan, C. J. (1990). Which behaviorism? A reply to Mahoney. American Psychologist, 45, 1179–1181.
Mahoney, M. J. (1989). Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism: Important distinctions based in scientism and objectivism. American Psychologist, 44, 1372–1377.
Mahoney, M. J. (1990). Diatribe is not dialogue: On selected attempts to attack and defend behaviorism. American Psychologist, 45, 1183–1184.
Morris, E. K. (1990). What Mahoney “knows.” American Psychologist, 45, 1178–1179.
Proctor, R. W., & Weeks, D. J. (1990). There is no room for scientism in scientific psychology: A comment on Mahoney. American Psychologist, 45, 1177–1178.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred K. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42, 780–786.
Wyatt, W. J. (1990). Radical behaviorism misrepresented: A response to Mahoney. American Psychologist, 45, 1181–1183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Catania, A.C. The Gifts of Culture and of Eloquence: An Open Letter to Michael J. Mahoney in Reply to His Article, “Scientific Psychology and Radical Behaviorism”. BEHAV ANALYST 14, 61–72 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392553
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392553