The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Humble Behaviorism

  • Allen Neuringer
Article

Key words

behavioral subject-matter behavioral methods behavioral theory personal characteristics of behavioral scientists humility science 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, L. K. (1987). Who goes first? The story of self-experimentation in medicine. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Balaban, M. T., Rhodes, D. L., & Neuringer, A. (in press). Orienting and defense responses to punishment: Effects on learning. Biological Psychology.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  4. Beveridge, W. I. B. (1950). The art of scientific investigation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  5. Boakes, R. (1984). From Darwin to behaviourism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carlton, P. L. (1983). A primer of behavioral pharmacology. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Cautela, J. R. (1967). Covert sensitization. Psychological Reports, 20, 459–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers, D., & Reisberg, D. (1985). Can mental images be ambiguous? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 317–328.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, L., Neuringer, A., & Rhodes, D. (1990). Effects of ethanol on reinforced variations and repetitions by rats under a multiple schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 1–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Davey, G. C. L. (Ed.). (1983). Animal models of human behavior. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Fantino, E., & Abarca, N. (1985). Choice, optimal foraging, and the delay-reduction hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferster, C., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin, J., & Sutherland, J. (1984). Guinea pig doctors: The drama of medical research through self-experimentation. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  14. Garcia, J., Hankins, W. G., & Rusniak, K. W. (1974). Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat. Science, 185, 824–831.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1952). The creative process. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  16. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  17. Glenn, S. S., & Hughes, H. H. (1978). Imaginal response events in systematic desensitization: A pilot study. Biological Psychology, 7, 303–309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene, B. F., Winett, R. A., Van Houten, R., Geller, E. S., & Iwata, B. A. (Eds.). (1987). Behavior analysis in the community. Lawrence, KA: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
  19. Grosch, J., & Neuringer, A. (1981). Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 3–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hearst, E. (1975). The classical-instrumental distinction: Reflexes, voluntary behavior, and categories of associative learning. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning, and cognitive processes: Vol. 2. Conditioning and behavior theory (pp. 181–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Herrnstein, R. J. (1984). Objects, categories, and discriminative stimuli. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 233–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Hineline, P. N. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: Its community, its functions, and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.Google Scholar
  23. Hineline, P. N. (1986). Retiming the operant-respondent distinction. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 55–79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Judson, H. F. (1980). The search for solutions. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kimura, M. (1983). The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lattal, K. A., & Gleeson, S. (1990). Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 27–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, C., & Boothe, R. G. (1981). Visual acuity development in infant monkeys (Macacca nemestrina) having known gestational ages. Vision Research, 21, 805–809.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyons, G. (1976). Constructive criticism. Berkeley, CA: Issues in Radical Therapy.Google Scholar
  30. Meck, W. H., Church, R. M., & Gibbon, J. (1985). Temporal integration in duration and number discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 591–597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mischel, W., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., & Zeiss, A. (1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 204–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moerk, E. L. (1983). The mother of Eve—As a first language teacher. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  35. Mowat, F. (1963). Never cry wolf. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
  36. Neuringer, A. J. (1970). Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 127–134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Neuringer, A. (1981). Self-experimentation: A call for change. Behaviorism, 9, 79–94.Google Scholar
  38. Neuringer, A. (1984). Melioration and self-experimentation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 397–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Neuringer, A. (1986). Can people behave “randomly?”: The role of feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Page, S., & Neuringer, A. (1985). Variability is an operant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 429–452.Google Scholar
  41. Peirce, C. S. (1923). Chance, love and logic. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
  42. Porter, D., & Neuringer, A. (1984). Music discriminations by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 138–148.Google Scholar
  43. Pryor, K. W., Haag, R., & O’Reilly, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior. Journal of the Experimental A nalysis of Behavior, 12, 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rachlin, H. (1989). Judgment, decision, and choice. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  45. Rachlin, H., Battalio, R., Kagel, J., & Green, L. (1981). Maximization theory in behavioral psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 371–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reichenbach, H. (1951). The rise of scientific philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Pavlovian conditioning analogues to Gestalt perceptual principles. In F. R. Brush & J. B. Overmier (Eds.), Affect, conditioning, and cognition (pp. 113–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Roberts, S. (1981). Isolation of an internal clock. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 242–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1988). Setting the stage for discovery. The Sciences, 28(3), 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Safire, W., & Safir, L. (1982). Good advice. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  51. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  52. Shettleworth, S. J. (1975). Reinforcement and the organization of behavior in golden hamsters: Hunger, environment, and food reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 56–87.Google Scholar
  53. Skinner, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  55. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  57. Skinner, B. F. (1987). How to discover what you have to say: A talk to students. In B. F. Skinner, Upon further reflection (pp. 131–143). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  58. Staddon, J. E. R., & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971). The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Teller, D. Y., Morse, R., Borton, R., & Regal, D. (1974). Visual acuity for vertical and diagonal gratings in human infants. Vision Research, 14, 1433–1439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurological Psychology, 18, 459–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allen Neuringer
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentReed CollegePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations