The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 221–225 | Cite as

Keller, Schoenfeld, Cumming, and Berryman as Instructional Stimuli

  • John A. Nevin
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137–153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Berryman, R., & Nevin, J. A. (1962). Interlocking schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 213–223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Cumming, W. W., & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant. In D. Mostovsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284–330). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Eckerman, D. A. (1970). Generalization and response mediation of a conditional discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 301–316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibbon, J. (1972). Timing and discrimination of shock density in avoidance. Psychological Review, 79, 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herrnstein, R. J., & Hineline, P. N. (1966). Negative reinforcement as shock frequency reduction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 421–430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  8. Mace, F. C., Lalli, J. S., Shea, M. C., Lalli, E. P., West, B. J., & Nevin, J. A. (in press). The momentum of everyday human behavior in a group home. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.Google Scholar
  9. Nevin, J. A. (1965). Decision theory in studies of discrimination in animals. Science, 150, 1057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nevin, J. A. (1974a). On the form of the relation between response rates in a multiple schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 237–248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Nevin, J. A. (1974b). Response strength in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 389–408.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Nevin, J. A. (1979). Reinforcement schedules and response strength. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Reinforcement and the organization of behaviour (pp. 117–157). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Nevin, J. A. (1981). Psychophysics and reinforcement schedules: An integration. In M. L. Commons & J. A. Nevin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior. Vol. 1. Discriminative effects of reinforcement schedules (pp. 3–27). Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  14. Nevin, J. A. (1989 May). Toward an integrative account of discriminated operant behavior. Invited address at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
  15. Nevin, J. A. (in press). Signal detection analysis of illusions and heuristics. In M. L. Commons, M. Davison, & J. A. Nevin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior. Vol. 11. Signal detection: Mechanisms, models, and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Nevin, J. A., & Grosch, J. (in press). Effects of reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.Google Scholar
  17. Rachlin, H. (1978). A molar theory of reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 345–360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Schoenfeld, W. N., and Cumming, W. W. (1960). Studies in a temporal classification of reinforcement schedules: Summary and projection. Proceedings of the National Academy, 46, 753–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schoenfeld, W. N., Cumming, W. W., & Hearst, E. (1956). On the classification of reinforcement schedules. Proceedings of the National Academy, 42, 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sidman, M. (1952). Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive “warning signal.” Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Nevin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations