The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 81–83 | Cite as

Misconstruing Behavioral Consequences: Teleology or Teleonomy

  • Abdulrazaq A. Imam
On Terms


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allport, F. H. (1937). Teleonomic description in the study of personality. Character and Personality, 5, 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayala, F. J. (1970). Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. Philosophy of Science, 37, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Griffore, R. J. (1978). Toward an Aristotelian analysis of causation in psychological research. Psychological Record, 28, 181–185.Google Scholar
  5. Mayr, E. (1965). Cause and effect in biology. In D. Lerner (Ed.), Cause and effect (pp. 33–50). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Moore, J. (1984). On behaviorism, knowledge, and causal explanations. Psychological Record, 34, 13–91.Google Scholar
  7. Morris, G. S. (1875). The final cause as principle of cognition and principle in nature. London: Robert Hardwicke.Google Scholar
  8. Moxley, R. (1984). Graphic discriminations for radical functional behaviorism. Behaviorism, 12, 81–96.Google Scholar
  9. Moxley, R. (1987). Three conceptual units for behavior. Behavior Analyst, 10, 17–26.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagel, E. (1953). Teleological explanations and teleological systems. In H. Feigl & M. Brodbeck (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 537–558). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  11. Pittendrigh, C. S. (1958). Adaptation, natural selection, and behavior. In A. Roe & G. G. Simpson (Eds.), Behavior and evolution (pp. 390–419). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Reese, H. W. (1984, May). Historical and philosophical analysis of causality. In H. W. Reese (Chair), Philosophical foundations and current views of causality in radical behaviorism. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  13. Simpson, G. G. (1958). Behavior and evolution. In A. Roe & G. G. Simpson (Eds.), Behavior and evolution (pp. 507–535). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Skinner, B. F. (1984). Selection by consequences. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, T. L. (1986). Biology as allegory: A review of Elliott Sober’s The Nature of Selection. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 105–112.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Sober, E. (1984). The nature of selection: Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  18. Woodfield, A. R. (1983). Teleology. In R. Harre & R. Lamb (Eds.), The encyclopedic dictionary of psychology (p. 630). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdulrazaq A. Imam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations