The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 59–67 | Cite as

Questioning Psychology’s Mechanism: A Review of Costall and Still’s Cognitive Psychology in Question

  • Edward K. Morris
Book Review


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amundson, R. (1983). E. C. Tolman and the intervening variable: A study in the epistemological history of psychology. Philosophy of Science, 50, 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Catania, A. C. (1973). The psychologies of structure, function, and development. American Psychologist, 28, 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Catania, A. C. (1978). The psychology of learning: Some lessons from the Darwinian revolution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 309, 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costall, A. (1980). The limits of language: Wittgenstein’s later philosophy and Skinner’s radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 8, 123–131.Google Scholar
  6. Costall, A. (1984). Are theories of perception necessary? A review of Gibson’s The ecological approach to visual perception. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 109–115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Day, W. F. (1969a). Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 315–328.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Day, W. F. (1969b). On certain similarities between the Philosophical Investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the operationism of B. F. Skinner. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 489–506.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Day, W. F. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deitz, S. M., & Arlington, R. L. (1984). Wittgenstein’s language games and the call to cognition. Behaviorism, 12, 7–14.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Goldiamond, I. (1962). Perception. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), Experimental foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 280–340). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Haugland, J. (Ed.). (1981). Mind design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hineline, P. N. (1984). Can a statement in cognitive terms be a behavior-analytic interpretation? The Behavior Analyst, 7, 97–100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Holt, E. B. (1915). The Freudian wish and its place in ethics. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hull, C. L. (1930). Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanism. Psychological Review, 37, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knapp, T. (1987). Perception and action. In S. Mogdil & C. Mogdil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 283–294). New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, V. L. (1986). Act psychologies and psychological nouns. The Psychological Record, 36, 167–177.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, V. L. (1987). The structure of behavior. Behaviorism, 15, 141–148.Google Scholar
  21. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). Hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 596–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marr, M. J. (1983). Memory: Models and metaphors. The Psychological Record, 33, 12–19.Google Scholar
  23. Marr, M. J. (1985). Tis the gift to be simple: A retrospective appreciation of Mach’s The science of mechanics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 129–138.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore, J. (1984). Conceptual contributions of Kantor’s interbehavioral psychology. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 183–187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris, E. K. (1984). Interbehavioral psychology and radical behaviorism: Some similarities and differences. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 197–204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris, E. K. (1988). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 289–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morris, E. K., Higgins, S. T., & Bickel, W. K. (1982). Comments on cognitive science in the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 109–125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Parrott, L. J. (1984). J. R. Kantor’s contribution to psychology and philosophy: A guide to further study. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schnaitter, R. (1987). Behaviorism is not cognitive and cognitivism is not behavioral. Behaviorism, 15, 1–11.Google Scholar
  30. Schwartz, B., Schuldenfrei, R., & Lacey, H. (1978). Operant psychology as factory psychology. Behaviorism, 6, 229–254.Google Scholar
  31. Sidman, M. (1978). Remarks. Behaviorism, 6, 265–268.Google Scholar
  32. Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Skinner, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. Journal of General Psychology, 12, 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277, 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: An operant analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1977). Why I am not a cognitive psychologist. Behaviorism, 5, 1–10.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, B. F. (1988). Comments. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior. The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences (p. 428). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Skinner, B. F. (1989). The origins of cognitive thought. American Psychologist, 44, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, L. D. (1982). Purpose and cognition: The limits of neorealist influence on Tolman’s psychology. Behaviorism, 10, 35–48.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism: A reassessment of the alliance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Tolman, E. C. (1949). Discussion (from Interrelationships between perception and personality: A symposium). Journal of Personality, 18, 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tolman, E. C. (1959). Principles of purposive behavior. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  47. Vaughan, M. (1987). Rule-governed behavior and higher mental processes. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 257–264). New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
  48. Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. L. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–227.Google Scholar
  49. Wasserman, E. A. (1981). Comparative psychology returns: A review of Hulse, Fowler, and Honigs’s Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 243–257.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward K. Morris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations