Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 45–57 | Cite as

Some Historical Relationships between Science and Technology with Implications for Behavior Analysis

  • Roy A. Moxley
Article

Abstract

The relationship between science and technology is examined in terms of some implications for behavior analysis. Problems result when this relationship is seen as one in which science generally begets technology in a one-way, or hierarchical, relationship. These problems are not found when the relationship between science and technology is seen as two-way, or symmetrical, within a larger context of relationships. Some historical examples are presented. Collectively, these and other examples in the references weaken the case for a prevailing one-way, hierarchical relationship and strengthen the case for a two-way, symmetrical relationship. In addition to being more accurate historically, the symmetrical relationship is also more consistent with the principles of behavior analysis.

Key words

science technology behavior analysis graphing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alford, L. P. (1934). Henry Laurence Gantt. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  2. Azrin, N. H. (1977). A strategy for applied research: Learning based but outcome oriented. American Psychologist, 32, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, D. M. (1981). A flight of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 85–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer, D. M. (1986). In application, frequency is not the only estimate of the probability of behavior units. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 117–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 313–327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, B., & Edge, D. (Eds.) (1982). Science in context. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beniger, J. R., & Robyn, D. L. (1978). Quantitative graphics in statistics: A brief history. The American Statistician, 32, 1–11.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, J. A. (1986). The mechanics’ philosophy and the mechanical philosophy. History of Science, 24, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boakes, R. (1984). From Darwinism to behaviorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bobbin, F. (1913). Some general principles of management applied to the problems of city-school systems. The twelfth yearbook of the national society for the study of education: Part I. The supervision of city schools (pp. 7–96). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bohme, G., Van Den Daele, W., & Krohn, W. (1978). The’ scientification’ of technology. In W. Krohn, E. T. Layton, & P. Weingart (Eds.), The dynamics of science and technology (pp. 219–250). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryan, W. L., & Harter, N. (1897). Studies in the physiology and psychology of the telegraphic language. The Psychological Review, 4, 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryan, W. L., & Harter, N. (1899). Studies in the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. The Psychological Review, 6, 345–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchanan, R. A. (1976). The Promethean revolution: Science, technology and history. History of Technology, 1, 73–83.Google Scholar
  15. Bunge, M. (1966). Technology as applied science. Technology and Culture, 7, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bush, V. (1970). Pieces of the action. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  17. Carmony, D. F., & Elliott, J. M. (1980). New Harmony, Indiana: Robert Owen’s seedbed for Utopia. Indiana Magazine of History, 76, 161–261.Google Scholar
  18. Coleman, S. R. (1987). Quantitative order in B. F. Skinner’s early research program. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 47–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Danziger, K. (1983). The schema of stimulated motion. History of Science, 21, 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day, W. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deitz, S. (1978). Science versus technology. American Psychologist, 33, 805–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deitz, S. (1983). Two correct definitions of applied. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 105–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. de Solla Price, D. J. (1982). The parallel structures of science and technology. In B. Barnes & D. Edge (Eds.), Science in context (pp. 164–176). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  24. Drake, S. (1980). Measurement in Galileo’s science. History of Technology, 5, 39–54.Google Scholar
  25. Dresslar, F. B. (1892). Some influences which affect the rapidity of voluntary movements. The American Journal of Psychology, 4, 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dvorak, A., Merrick, N. L., Dealey, W. L., & Ford, G. C. (1936). Typewriting behavior: Psychology applied to teaching and learning typewriting. New York: American Book.Google Scholar
  27. Epling, W. F., & Pierce, W. D. (1986). The basic importance of applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 89–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Funkhouser, H. (1937). Historical development of the graphical representation of statistical data. Osiris, 3, 269–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gantt, H. L. (1974). Organization for work. Easton, PA: Hive. (Original work published 1919)Google Scholar
  30. Hall, A. R. (1978). On knowing, and knowing how to …. History of Technology, 3, 91–103.Google Scholar
  31. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen Pepper’s World Hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A., & Solnick, J. V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Henry, J. (1886). The improvement of the mechanical arts. In Scientific writings of Joseph Henry (Vol. 1, pp. 306–324). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. (Original work published 1855)Google Scholar
  34. Henry, J. (1972). In N. Reingold (Ed.), The papers of Joseph Henry (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. (Original work published 1832)Google Scholar
  35. Herodotus (1972). The histories (A. de Selincourt, Trans.; A. R. Burn, Rev.). Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Hindle, B., & Lubar, S. (1986). Engines of change. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hodgkin, A. L. (1976). Chance and design in electrophysiology: An informal account of certain experiments on nerve carried out between 1934 and 1952. Journal of Physiology, 263, 1–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoff, H. E., & Geddes, L. A. (1959). Graphic registration before Ludwig: The antecedents of the kymograph. Isis, 50, 5–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoff, H. E., & Geddes, L. A. (1962). The beginnings of graphic recording. Isis, 53, 287–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hopkins, B. L. (1987). Comments on the future of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 339–346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Jevons, F. (1976). The interaction of science and technology today, or, is science the mother of invention? Technology and Culture, 17, 729–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Joyce, B., & Moxley, R. A. (1988). August Dvorak (1894–1975): Early expressions of applied behavior analysis and precision teaching. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 33–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Keevil, J. J. (1957). Medicine and the navy 1200–1900 (Vol. 1). Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar
  44. Keller, F. S. (1977). Summers and sabbaticals: Selected papers on psychology and education. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  45. Keller, A. (1984). Has science created technology? Minerva, 22, 160–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kline, M. (1972). Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Langrish, J., Gibbons, M., Evans, W. G., & Jevons, F. R. (1972). Wealth from knowledge. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Layton, E. T. (1971). Mirror-image twins: The communities of science and technology in 19th-century America. Technology and Culture, 12, 562–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Layton, E. T. (1976). American ideologies of science and engineering. Technology and Culture, 17, 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lindsley, O. R. (1974). Precision teaching in perspective. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior: Behaviour modification in education (Vol. 3, pp. 387–391). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  51. Lloyd, C. (1961). The introduction of lemon juice as a cure for scurvy. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 35, 123–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. McGreevy, P. (1984). Frequency and the standard celeration chart: Necessary components of precision teaching. Journal of Precision Teaching, 5, 28–36.Google Scholar
  53. Michael, J. (1980). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Mosteller, F. (1981). Innovation and evaluation. Science, 211(4485), 881–886.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Brien, J. A. (1926). Silent reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Pauly, P. J. (1987). Controlling life: Jacques Loeb and the engineering ideal in biology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pennypacker, H. S. (1986). The challenge of technology transfer. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 147–156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Pepper, S. C. (1970). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1942)Google Scholar
  59. Perrone, M., Galizio, M., & Baron, A. (1988). The relevance of animal-based principles in the laboratory study of human operant conditioning. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 59–85). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Pierce, J. R. (1961). Symbols, signals and noise: The nature and process of communication. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  61. Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1980). What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Poling, A., Picker, M., Grossett, D., Hall-Johnson, E., & Holbrook, M. (1981). The schism between experimental and applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 93–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Purchas, S. (1905). Hakluytus Posthumus (Vol. 2). Glasgow: James MacLehose.Google Scholar
  65. Russell, B. (1970). An outline of philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1927)Google Scholar
  66. Rymer, J. (1988). Scientific composing processes: How eminent scientists write journal articles. In D. A. Joliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research: Vol. 2. Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 211–250). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  67. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  68. Skinner, B. F. (1972). Cumulative record (3rd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  69. Skinner, B. F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Upon further reflection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  71. Studwell, P., & Moxley, R. (1984). Self-recording in kindergarten: A Study in naturalistic evaluation. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 450–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taylor, F. (1911). Shop management. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  73. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology: The Pychology of Learning (Vol. 2). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tilling, L. (1975). Early experimental graphs. British Journal for the History of Science, 8, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van Houten, R. (1984). Setting up performance feedback systems in the classroom. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trapp-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 114–125). Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
  76. Vincenti, W. G. (1988). How did it become “obvious” that an airplane should be inherently stable? American Heritage of Invention & Technology, 4, 50–56.Google Scholar
  77. Washburne, C. W. (1922). Educational measurement as a key to individual instruction and promotions. Journal of Educational Research, 5, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  79. Westfall, R. S. (1973). Newton and the fudge factor. Science, 179(4075), 751–758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Ziman, J. (1984). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy A. Moxley
    • 1
  1. 1.West Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations