The Development and Adoption of Controversial Default Technologies
Default technologies evolve from failure. Within the realm of human behavior, technologies based on the use of aversive contingencies can be conceptualized as default technologies because they come into play when natural contingencies or positive reinforcement fail to produce a desired behavioral outcome. Historical as well as contemporary events suggest that it is a mistake for behavior analysts to advocate for the adoption of aversive technologies. We must, however, continue to play a leading role in the development of such technologies so that they will be used in an appropriate manner. Furthermore, the eventual elimination of aversive technologies will be possible only through continued, careful, and experimental analysis of the contexts of failure in which they are born.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Axelrod, S., & Apsche, J. (1983). The effects of punishment on human behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Baer, D. M. (1970). A case for the selective reinforcement of punishment. In C. Neuringer & J. L. Michael (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology (pp. 243–249). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Baumeister, A. A., Frye, G. D., & Schroeder, S. R. (1984). Neurochemical correlates of self-injurious behavior. In J. L. Mulick and B. L. Mallory (Eds.), Transitions in mental retardation: Advocacy, technology, and science (pp. 207–222). New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Blatt, B. (1970). Exodus from pandemonium. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Donnellen, A. M., & LaVigna, G. W. (1987, December). A note of cautious optimism. D D Directions, 2.Google Scholar
- Guess, D., Helmstetter, E., Turnbull, H. R., & Knowlton, S. (1987). Use of aversive procedures with persons who are disabled: An historical review and critical analysis. Seattle, WA: The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.Google Scholar
- Halt urged in shock device use. (1988, April 17). The New York Times, p. 18.Google Scholar
- Landers, S. (1987, December). Aversive device sparks controversy. APA Monitor, 15.Google Scholar
- Matson, J. L., & DiLorenzo, T. M. (1984). Punishment and its alternatives: A new perspective for behavior modification. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Rivera, G. (1972). Willowbrook: A report on how it is and why it doesn’t have to be that way. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1982, September). Why are we not acting to save the world? American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. Reprinted in: B. F. Skinner (1987). Upon further reflection (pp. 114). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Viadero, D. (1987, October 7). U.S. to monitor aversive therapy. Education Week, 14.Google Scholar
- Will, M., & Reynolds, W. B. (1987, September 29). Concerns about electroshock therapy. The Washington Post, Letters.Google Scholar