Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 189–196 | Cite as

Reinforcement in the Sixteenth Century: Was the Bard a Behaviorist?

  • James D. Dougan
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Shakespeare’s play The Taming of the Shrew is described in terms of behavior analysis. Changes in the behavior of the character Kate result from her husband Petruchio’s manipulation of environmental contingencies. Aspects of behavior analysis found in the play include the identification of target behavior, the establishment of events as reinforcers, the arrangement of contingencies between responses and reinforcers, and the assessment of post-intervention responding. Several aspects of Shakespeare’s description are related to current issues in behavior analysis bearing on theory, cultural practices, and public relations.

Key words

Literary Analysis Applied Behavior Analysis Verbal Behavior Shakespeare 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1965). The measurement and reinforcement of behavior of psychotics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 357–383.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137–153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Blampied, N. M. (1985). Quotation: Shakespeare on cognitive behavior modification. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 320.Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, W. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.) Cognition and the Symbolic Processes (pp. 1–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233–248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Dougan, J. D. (1987, May). A behavioral analysis of the cognitive revolution. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1955). Totem and taboo. In Standard Edition, Volume 13. London: Hogarth Press. (First German Edition, 1913)Google Scholar
  9. Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-govered behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Glenn, S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden Two. Behavior Analysis and Social Action, 5, 2–8.Google Scholar
  11. Harbage, A. (Ed.). (1969). The Pelican Shakespeare. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  12. Hosley, R. (1969). Introduction: The Taming of the Shrew. In A. Harbage (Ed.) The Pelican Shakespeare (pp. 80–83). New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  13. Jung, C. G. (1953). Psychology and alchemy. In Collected Works, Vol 13. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (First German Edition, 1944)Google Scholar
  14. Kazdin, A. E. (1978). Methodology of applied behavior analysis. In A. C. Catania & T. A. Brigham (Eds.) Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 61–104). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  15. Kazdin, A. E., Bootzin, R. R. (1972). The token economy: An evaluation review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 343–372.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, V. L. (1986). Act psychologies and the psychological nouns. The Psychological Record, 36, 167–177.Google Scholar
  17. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Risley, T. R. (1970). Behavior modification: An experimental therapeutic endeavor. In L. A. Hamerlynck, P. O. Davidson, & L. E. Acker (Eds.) Behavior modification and ideal mental health services (pp. 103–127). Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rogers, C. R., & Skinner, B. F. (1956). Some issues concerning the control of human behavior. Science, 124, 1057–1066.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwartz, B. (1984). Psychology of learning and behavior (2nd Ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Skinner, B.F. (1934, January). Has Gertrude Stein a secret? Atlantic Monthly.Google Scholar
  22. Skinner, B. F. (1939). The alliteration in Shakespeare’s sonnets: A study of literary behavior. Psychological Record, 3, 186–192.Google Scholar
  23. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Skinner, B. F. (1957). The experimental analysis of behavior. American Scientist, 45, 343–371.Google Scholar
  26. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  27. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  28. Stolz, S. B. (1978). Ethics of social and educational interventions: Historical context and a behavioral analysis. In A. C. Catania and T. A. Brigham (Eds.) Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 652–667). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Dougan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations