Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 147–160 | Cite as

Walden Two: The Morality of Anarchy

  • Evalyn F. Segal
Article

Abstract

The utopian label is often pinned on calls for comprehensive change as a means of dismissing them from serious consideration.… [S]ocial orders come and go, and those who indulge in Utopian thinking may be more prepared for … the inevitability of widespread societal transformation.… Keeping utopia in mind can prevent our settling for minor reforms when more significant change might be possible. (Fox, 1985, p. 55)

When … I called myself a benign anarchist … someone said that that was not like the dictatorship of Walden Two. But Walden Two was anarchistic.…The functions delegated to [authority figures] in the world at large were performed by the people themselves through face-to-face commendation and censure. (Skinner, 1983, p. 426, emphasis his)

The issue for anarchists is not whether there should be structure or order, but what kind there should be and what its sources ought to be. The individual or group which has sufficient liberty to be self-regulating will have the highest degree of order; the imposition of order from above and outside induces resentment and rebellion where it does not encourage childlike dependence and impotence, and so becomes a force for disorder. (Barclay, 1982, p. 17)

Key words

Walden Two utopias communitarian movement social engineering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allman, W. F. (1984). Nice guys finish first. Science 84, 5 (October), 25–32.Google Scholar
  2. Ardila, R. (1979). Walden tres. Barcelona: Ediciones CEAC.Google Scholar
  3. Armendariz, F. (1985). The living community: Los Horcones. In S. W. Bijou (Chair), Walden Two revisited. Symposium presented at the 93rd convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August.Google Scholar
  4. Azuma, H. (1984). Secondary control: A heterogeneous category. American Psychologist, 39, 970–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barclay, H. (1982). People without government: An anthropology of anarchism. London: Kahn & Averill.Google Scholar
  6. Crowe, B. (1969). The tragedy of the commons revisited. Science, 166, 1103–1107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Edney, J. J. (1981). Paradoxes on the commons: Scarcity and the problem of equality. Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 3–34. Cited in Fox, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox, D. R. (1985). Psychology, ideology, utopia, and the commons. American Psychologist, 40, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1962). Civilization and its discontents (J. Riviere, Trans.). New York: Norton. (First published 1930)Google Scholar
  10. Garrett, K. R. (1985). Elbow room in a functional analysis: Freedom and dignity regained. Behaviorism, 13, 21–36.Google Scholar
  11. Haan, N. (1982). Can research on morality be “scientific”? American Psychologist, 37, 1096–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, G. S. (1920). The fall of Atlantis. In Recreations of a psychologist. New York: Appleton. (Cited in Morawski, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardin, G. (1978). Carrying capacity as an ethical concept. In Stalking the wild taboo (2nd ed.) (pp. 245–261). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  15. Hemingway, E. (1937). To have and have not. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  16. Hobbes, T. (1939). Leviathan. In E. A. Burtt, (Ed.), The English philosophers from Bacon to Mill. New York: The Modern Library. (First published 1651)Google Scholar
  17. Huxley, A. (1946). Brave new world. New York: Harper. (First published 1932)Google Scholar
  18. Keehn, J. D. (Ed.). (1984). Walden 3, or the prisoners of venture. Toronto: York University.Google Scholar
  19. McDougall, W. (1921). National welfare and national decay. London: Methuen. (Cited in Morawski, 1982)Google Scholar
  20. McGregor, K. (1985). The living community: Twin Oaks. In S. W.Bijou (Chair), Walden Two revisited. Symposium presented at the 93rd convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer, A. (1983). Almost Eden. Science 83, 4 (July/August), 94–96.Google Scholar
  22. Morawski, J. G. (1982). Assessing psychology’s moral heritage through our neglected utopias. American Psychologist, 37, 1082–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Munsterberg, H. (1916). Tomorrow: Letters to a friend in Germany. New York: Appleton. (Cited in Morawski, 1982)Google Scholar
  24. Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  25. Plattel, M. G. (1972). Utopian and critical thinking. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  26. Schell, J. (1982). The fate of the earth. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  27. Schell, J. (1986). Reflections: A better today. The New Yorker, Feb. 3, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
  28. Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  29. Segal, E. F. (1984). Prisoner 0006: The creative state of Walden Two. In J. D. Keehn (Ed.), Walden 3, or, the prisoners of venture (pp. 91–112). Toronto: York University.Google Scholar
  30. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  32. Skinner, B.F. (1976). Walden Two (2nd ed). New York: Macmillan. (First edition published 1948)Google Scholar
  33. Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  34. Spence, J. T. (1985). Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American Psychologist, 40, 1285–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steiner, G. (1986). Language under surveillance: The writer and the state. The New York Times Book Review, Jan. 12, pp. 12, 36.Google Scholar
  36. “Talk of the town.” (1983). The New Yorker, Jan. 17, p. 29.Google Scholar
  37. Turnbull, C. (1983). The human cycle. New York: Simon & Schuster. (Reviewed in Meyer, 1983)Google Scholar
  38. Waller, B. (1982). Skinner’s two stage value theory. Behaviorism, 10, 25–44.Google Scholar
  39. Watson, J. B. (1929). Should a child have more than one mother? Liberty Magazine, pp. 31–35.Google Scholar
  40. Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39, 955–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weschler, L. (1983). A reporter at large: A state of war—II. The New Yorker, April 18, pp. 52–123.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evalyn F. Segal
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations