The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 113–116 | Cite as

When We Speak of Integrating …

  • Timothy D. Hackenberg
On Terms

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anger, D. (1963). The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 477–506.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacotti, A. V. (1976). Home cage feeding time controls responding under multiple schedules. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137–153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, W. M. (1981). Optimization and the matching law as accounts of instrumental behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 387–403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Branch, M.N. (1977). On the role of “memory” in the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 28, 171–179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Catania, A.C. (1973). The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior. Behaviorism, 1, 103–116.Google Scholar
  7. Dinsmoor, J. A. (1977). Escape, avoidance, punishment: Where do we stand? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 28, 83–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Findley, J. D. (1962). An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 113–166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Flanagan, O. J., Jr. (1980). Skinnerian metaphysics and the problem of operationism. Behaviorism, 8, 1–13.Google Scholar
  11. Harzern, P., & Zeiler, M D. (1981). Advances in the analysis of behavior: Vol. 2. Predictability, correlation, and contiguity. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Hineline, P. N. (1984). Aversive control: A separate domain? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 495–509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelleher, R. T. (1966). Chaining and conditioned reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 160–212). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  14. Malagodi, E. F. (1986). On radicalizing behaviorism: A call for cultural analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 1–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazur, J. E. (1981). Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation. Science, 214, 823–825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris, E. K., Higgins, S. T., & Bickel, W. K. (1982). Comments on cognitive science in the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 109–125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Rachlin, H. (1978). A molar theory of reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 345–360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Rachlin, H., Battalio, R., Kagel, J., & Green, L. (1981). Maximization theory in behavioral psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 371–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwartz, B. (1986). Allocation of complex, sequential operants on multiple and concurrent schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 283–295.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Shimp, C. P. (1966). Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 443–455.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Shimp, C. P. (1976). Organization in memory and behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 113–130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Shimp, C. P. (1984). Cognition, behavior, and the experimental analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 407–420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Silberberg, A., Hamilton, B., Ziriax, J. M., & Casey, J. (1978). The structure of choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 368–398.Google Scholar
  24. Skinner, B. F. (1931). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 427–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skinner, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. Journal of General Psychology, 12, 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  27. Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Staddon, J. E. R., Hinson, J. M., & Kram, R. (1981). Optimal choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 397–412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson, T., & Zeiler, M. D. (Eds.). (1986). Analysis and integration of behavioral units. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Vaughan, W., Jr., & Miller, H. L., Jr. (1984). Optimization versus response-strength accounts of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 337–348.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy D. Hackenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations