Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 47–65 | Cite as

Quantitative Order in B. F. Skinner’s Early Research Program, 1928–1931

  • S. R. Coleman
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a coherent story of Skinner’s graduate-school (1928–1931) research projects, adding to Skinner’s own accounts a different emphasis and a number of interesting details. The story is guided by the proposal that a search for quantitative order was the “unifying force” amid the variety of apparatus changes and shifts of research topic in Skinner’s early development as a researcher. Archival laboratory-research records from several apparatuses which Skinner constructed between 1928 and 1931 (1) indicate that his research program was more complicated than he has implied; (2) show that he worked on three interdependent lines of investigation simultaneously; (3) suggest that change or abandonment of an apparatus or a project was markedly affected by his success (and failure) in his primary objective, which was to find quantitative orderliness in measured behavior. Frequent apparatus change in the period of 1928 to 1930 ceased when he obtained quantitative orderliness in the panel-press and lever-box preparations. In the examination of archival records, questions about the enterprise of biographical understanding are considered.

Key words

Skinner, B. F. history of psychology quantification cumulative record apparatus methodology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes, T. C., & Skinner, B.F. (1930). The progressive increase in the geotropic response of the ant Aphaenogaster. Journal of General Psychology, 4, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bixenstine, V. E. (1964). Empiricism in latter-day behavioral science. Science, 145, 464–467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannon, W. B. (1915). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, S. R. (1981). Historical context and systematic functions of the concept of the operant. Behaviorism, 9, 207–226.Google Scholar
  5. Coleman, S. R. (1984). Background and change in B. F. Skinner’s metatheory from 1930 to 1938. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 471–500.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, S. R. (1985). B. F. Skinner, 1926–1928: From literature to psychology. Behavior Analyst, 8, 77–92.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Crozier, W. J. (1928). Tropisms. Journal General Psychology, 1, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniel, C., & Wood, F. S. (1971). Fitting equations to data. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  9. Ellson, D. G. (1939). The concept of reflex reserve. Psychological Review, 46, 566–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall, A. R. (1956). The scientific revolution, 1500–1800: The formation of the modern scientific attitude (paperback ed.). Boston: Beacon. (Original work published 1954)Google Scholar
  12. Hall, A. R. (1981). From Galileo to Newton (paperback ed.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1963)Google Scholar
  13. Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections (A. Jaffe, Ed.; R. & C. Winston, Trans.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  14. Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  15. Magnus, R. (1924). Körperstellung. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pavlov, I. P. (1960). Conditioned reflexes. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1927)Google Scholar
  17. Richter, C. P. (1927). Animal behavior and internal drives. Quarterly Review of Biology, 2, 307–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scharff, J. (1982). Skinner’s concept of the operant: From necessitarian to probabilistic causality. Behaviorism, 10, 45–54.Google Scholar
  19. Sherrington, C. S. (1961). The integrative action of the nervous system (paperback ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1906)Google Scholar
  20. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  21. Skinner, B. F. (1930). On the conditions of elicitation of certain eating reflexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 16, 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Skinner, B. F. (1931). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 427–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skinner, B.F. (1932a). Drive and reflex strength. Journal of General Psychology, 6, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skinner, B.F. (1932b). Drive and reflex strength. II. Journal of General Psychology, 6, 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skinner, B. F. (1933a). The measurement of “spontaneous activity.” Journal of General Psychology, 9, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skinner, B.F. (1933b). The rate of establishment of a discrimination. Journal of General Psychology, 9, 302–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Skinner, B. F. (1935). Two types of conditioned reflex and a pseudo type. Journal of General Psychology, 12, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skinner, B.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  29. Skinner, B. F. (1939). The alliteration in Shakespeare’s sonnets: A study in literary behavior. Psychological Record, 3, 186–192.Google Scholar
  30. Skinner, B. F. (1940). The nature of the operant reserve (Abstract). Psychological Bulletin, 37, 423.Google Scholar
  31. Skinner, B. F. (1941). A quantitative estimate of certain types of sound-patterning in poetry. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skinner, B. F. (1944). [A review of Hull’s Principles of Behavior]. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 276–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1956a). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skinner, B.F. (1956b). Critique of psychoanalytic concepts and theories. In H. Feigl & M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 1, Studies in the philosophy of science and the concepts of psychology and psychoanalysis, (pp. 77–87). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. (1956c). [A review of Bush and Mosteller’s Stochastic Models for Learning.] Contemporary Psychology, 1, 101–103.Google Scholar
  38. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skinner, B. F. (1967). B. F. Skinner. In E. G. Boring & G. Lindzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 387–413). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism (Vintage paperback ed.). New York: Random.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, B. F. (1976). Particulars of my life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  42. Skinner, B.F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  43. Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  44. Skinner, B. F. (1986). What is wrong with daily life in the Western world? American Psychologist, 41, 568–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Skinner, B. F., & Crozier, W.J. (1931). [AReview of Franklin Fearing, Reflex Action, A Study in the History of Physiological Psychology.] Journal of General Psychology, 5, 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, G. H. (1923). The relation between “spontaneous” activity and oestrus cycle in the white rat. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 2. (Whole Number 6)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. R. Coleman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations