Function-Altering Effects of Contingency-Specifying Stimuli
- 4 Downloads
Contingengy-specifying stimuli (CSSs) can function differently than discriminative stimuli. Rather than evoking behavior due to a history of discrimination training, they alter the function of other stimuli and, therefore, the behavioral relations involving those stimuli. CSSs can alter the evocative function of discriminative stimuli, establishing operations, and conditional stimuli, as well as the efficacy of reinforcing and punishing stimuli and of stimuli that can function in second-order respondent conditioning. The concept of function-altering CSSs has implications for such areas of interest as stimulus equivalence, the terminology involving “rules” and “rule-governed behavior,” and the way in which behavior analysts view the effects of such basic processes as reinforcement and punishment.
Key wordscontingency-specifying stimuli function-altering effects verbal stimuli rules
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Martin, G., & Pear, J. (1983). Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Michael, J. (1983). Evocative and repertoire altering effects of an environmental event. VB News, 2, 21–23.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, G. S. (1975). A primer of operant conditioning. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
- Rilling, M. (1977). Stimulus control and inhibitory processes. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 432–480). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar