Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

A Behavior-Analytic Critique of Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory

  • Anthony Biglan
Article

Abstract

A behavior-analytic critique of self-efficacy theory is presented. Self-efficacy theory asserts that efficacy expectations determine approach behavior and physiological arousal of phobics as well as numerous other clinically important behaviors. Evidence which is purported to support this assertion is reviewed. The evidence consists of correlations between self-efficacy ratings and other behaviors. Such response-response relationships do not unequivocally establish that one response causes another. A behavior-analytic alternative to self-efficacy theory explains these relationships in terms of environmental events. Correlations between self-efficacy rating behavior and other behavior may be due to the contingencies of reinforcement that establish a correspondence between such verbal predictions and the behavior to which they refer. Such a behavior-analytic account does not deny any of the empirical relationships presented in support of self-efficacy theory, but it points to environmental variables that could account for those relationships and that could be manipulated in the interest of developing more effective treatment procedures.

Key words

Self-efficacy expectations correspondence behavior analysis rule-governed behavior phobias private events 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer, J. S., Holt, C. S., & Lichtenstein, E. (1986). Self-efficacy and smoking re-examined: Construct validity and clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 846–852.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, R. A., Williams, J. A., Osnes, P. G., & Stokes, T. F. (1984). Delayed reinforcement as an indiscriminable contingency in verbal/nonverbal correspondence training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 429–440.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1982a). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1982b). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 13, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 125–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G.N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bandura, A., Reese, L., & Adams, N. E. (1982). Micro-analysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 5–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bandura, A., Taylor, C. B., Williams, S. L., Mefford, I. N., & Barchas, J. D. (1985). Catecholamine secretion as a function of perceived coping self-efficacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 406–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Becker, W. C., & Carnine, D. (1980). Direct instruction: An effective approach to educational intervention with the disadvantaged and low performers. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 429–473). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college men and women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Biglan, A., & Dow, M. G. (1981). Toward a second-generation model: A problem-specific approach. In L. P. Rehm (Ed.), Behavior therapy for depression (pp. 97–121). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  18. Biglan, A., & Kass, D. J. (1977). The empirical nature of behavior therapies. Behaviorism, 5, 1–15.Google Scholar
  19. Biran, M., & Wilson, G. T. (1981). Treatment of phobic disorders using cognitive and exposure methods: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 886–899.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Borkovec, T. D. (1978). Self-efficacy: Cause or reflection of behavioral change? Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brady, J. P. (1971). Metronome-conditioned speech retraining for stuttering. Behavior Therapy, 2, 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Christopherson, E. R., & Rapoff, M. A. (1980). Pediatric psychology: An appraisal. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 311–329). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Condiotte, M. M., & Lichtenstein, E. (1981). Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 648–658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Curran, J. P. (1977). Skills training as an approach to the treatment of heterosexual-social anxiety: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 140–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Deguchi, H. (1984). Observational learning from a radical-behavioristic viewpoint. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 83–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. DiClemente, C. C. (1981). Self-efficacy and smoking cessation maintenance: A preliminary report. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 5, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Expectations as causal elements in behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gauthier, J., & Ladouceur, R. (1981). The influence of self-efficacy reports on performance. Behavior Therapy, 12, 436–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gelder, M., & Marks, I. M. (1966). Severe agoraphobia: A controlled prospective trial of behavior therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 309–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Glasgow, R. E., Klepac, R. K., Dowling, J., & Rokke, P. D. (1984). Extensions of self-efficacy: Predicting pain tolerance. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Dakota: Williston, ND.Google Scholar
  31. Hayes, S. C. (in press). A contextual approach to therapeutic change. In N. Jacobson (Ed.), Cognitive and behavior therapies in clinical practice. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  32. Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Hayes, S. C., Rosenfarb, I., Wulfert, E., Munt, E. D., Korn, Z., & Zettle, R. D. (1985). Self-reinforcement effects: An artifact of social standard settings? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 201–214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Hersen, M., & Bellack, A. S. (1976). Social skills training for chronic psychiatric patients: Rationale, research findings, and future directions. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 17, 559–580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hops, H. (1982). Social skills training for socially withdrawn/isolated children. In P. Karoly & J. Steffen (Eds.), Enhancing children’s competencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  37. Hops, H. (1985). [A review of Marital interaction: Analysis and modification]. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 235–246.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Israel, A. C., & Brown, M. S. (1977). Correspondence training, prior verbal training, and control of nonverbal behavior via control of verbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 333–338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1979). Marital therapy: Strategies based on social learning and behavior exchange principles. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  40. Kazdin, A. E. (1978). History of behavior modification: Experimental foundations of contemporary research. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kazdin, A. E. (1979). Sociopsychological factors in psychopathology. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Research and practice in social skills training (pp. 41–74). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirsch, I. (1980). “Microanalytic” analyses of efficacy expectations as predictors of performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirsch, I., & Wickless, C. V. (1983). Concordance rates between self-efficacy and approach behavior are redundant. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lane, T. W., & Borkovec, T. D. (1984). The influence of therapeutic expectancy/demand on self-efficacy ratings. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lang, P. J. (1978). Self-efficacy theory: Thoughts on cognition and unification. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. LoPiccolo, J., & LoPiccolo, L. (1978). Handbook of sex therapy. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maletzky, B. M. (1980). Assisted covert sensitization. In D. J. Cox & R. J. Daitzman (Eds.), Exhibitionism: Description, assessment, and treatment (pp. 187–251). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  48. Marr, J. (1984). Conceptual approaches and issues. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 353–362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. McAlister, A., Perry, C., & Maccoby, N. (1979). Adolescent smoking: Onset and prevention. Pediatrics, 63, 650–658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Michael, J. (1984). Verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 363–376.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Mischel, W. (1968). Traits and states as constructs. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Moore, J. (1984a). On behaviorism, knowledge, and causal explanation. The Psychological Record, 34, 73–97.Google Scholar
  53. Moore, J. (1984b). On privacy, causes, and contingencies. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 3–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelson, R. O., Hayes, S. C., Spong, R. T., Jarrett, R. B., & McKnight, D. L. (1983). Self-reinforcement: Appealing misnomer or effective mechanism? Behavioral Research and Therapy, 21, 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paniagua, F. A., & Baer, D. M. (1982). The analysis of correspondence training as a chain reinforceable at any point. Child Development, 53, 786–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Patterson, G. R. (1982). A social learning approach to family intervention: Vol. 3. Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  57. Rachman, S. J. (1978). Fear and courage. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  58. Risley, T. R., & Hart, B. (1968). Developing correspondence between the nonverbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 267–281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosenfarb, I., & Hayes, S. C. (1984). Social standard setting: The Achilles heel of informational accounts of therapeutic change. Behavior Therapy, 15, 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shalock, R., & Harper, R. (1978). Placement from community-based mental retardation programs. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 240–247.Google Scholar
  61. Skinner, B. F. (1945). Operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  65. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  66. Telch, M. J., Bandura, A., Vinciguerra, P., Agras, S., & Stout, A. L. (1982). Social demand and congruence between self-efficacy and performance. Behavior Therapy, 13, 694–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weinberg, R. S., Yukelson, D., & Jackson, A. (1980). Effect of public and private efficacy expectations on competitive performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 340–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitman, T. L., Scibak, J. W., Butler, K. M., Richter, R., & Johnson, M. R. (1982). Improving classroom behavior in mentally retarded children through correspondence training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 545–564.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Zeiss, A., Lewinsohn, P., & Munoz, R. F. (1979). Nonspecific improvement effects in depression using interpersonal skills training, pleasant activity schedules, or cognitive training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 427–439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1983). Effect of social context on the impact of coping self-statements. Psychological Reports, 52, 391–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule-governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavioral therapy. Advances in Cognitive-Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1, 73–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Biglan
    • 1
  1. 1.Oregon Research InstituteEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations