The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 39–45 | Cite as

Learning By A. C. Catania

  • Jay Moore

Conclusion and Summary

Professor Catania’s book, Learning, deals with a wider variety of important issues than any other single text currently available in the experimental analysis of behavior. The book emphasizes the continuity of behavioral processes, from lower animals to humans, from maze running to lever pressing to paired-associate learning. The book also gives a true picture of what it means to be a behaviorist. It does not do so because it eschews data from runways and mazes in favor of data from operant chambers, or because it considers only intersubjectively verifiable events, but precisely because it does consider data from apparatuses other than operant chambers, and in the case of private events, consider events not themselves verifiable by more than one person. The essential feature of behaviorism, therefore, is its epistemology, not its hardware, and we get an excellent illustration of this epistemology at work in the text. Now, whether any text should be used by an instructor is a way of asking whether that text will help achieve the special reinforcers that come from teaching. Catania’s text has for me.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bloom, B. S. A taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David Mackay Co., 1956.Google Scholar
  2. Catania, A. C. Glossary. In A. C. Catania (Ed.). Contemporary research in operant behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott-Foresman, 1968. Pp. 327–349.Google Scholar
  3. Catania, A. C. Elicitation, reinforcement, and stimulus control. In R. Giaser (Ed.), The nature of reinforcement. New York: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 196–220.Google Scholar
  4. Catania, A. C. The nature of learning. In J. A. Nevin and G. S. Reynolds (Eds.), The study of behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott-Foresman, 1973. Pp. 31–68.Google Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C. Learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Guttman, N., and Kalish, H. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965, 51, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenkins, H., and Harrison, R. Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 59, 246–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kamin, L. Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell and R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969. Pp. 279–296.Google Scholar
  9. Moore, J. On the principle of operationism in a science of behavior. Behaviorism, 1975, 3, 120–138.Google Scholar
  10. Nevin, J. A., and Reynolds, G. S. (Eds.), The study of behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott-Foresman, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. Rachlin, H. Behavior and learning. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. Rescorla, R., and Wagner, A. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972. Pp. 64–99.Google Scholar
  13. Reynolds, G. S. Attention in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961, 4, 203–208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Skinner, B. F. Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Skinner, B. F. The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.Google Scholar
  16. Wilkie, D. M., and Masson, M. E. Attention in the pigeon. A reevaluation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976, 26, 207–212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations