Many of the world’s current problems are the result of behavior, and traditional appeals to mental determinants are again proving inadequate. The time for a behavioristic alternative appears ripe, yet many behaviorists seem to be becoming less behavioristic and more mentalistic. When confronted with the complexity of human behavior many are resorting to the intellectual comfort and safety of mentalism. A recent example of this tendency (Schwartz et al, 1978) is presented and discussed. Additionally, speculations regarding the origins of the resurgence of mentalism are presented, and it is proposed that arranging histories which provide for more rigorous and lasting control of verbal behavior about behavior may serve to improve the situation.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Day, W. On the difference between radical and methodological behaviorism. Presented at meeting of Midwestern Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago, May, 1977.Google Scholar
- DHEW. HRA, HSA, CDC, OASH, & ADAMHA Public Advisory Committees, Authority, Structure, Functions, Members, Nov. 1, 1978. DHEW Publication No. HRA 79–601, 1978.Google Scholar
- Honig, W. K. and Staddon, J. E. R. (Eds). Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, B., Schuldenfrei, R. and Lacey, H. Operant psychology as factory psychology. Behaviorism, 1978, 6, 229–254.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press, 1953.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. Contingencies of reinforcement: a theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1974.Google Scholar
- Taylor, F. W. Principles of scientific management. New York: W. W. Norton, 1967.Google Scholar