Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 11–21 | Cite as

Creative Behavior

  • Howard N. Sloane
  • George T. Endo
  • Gabriel M. Della-Piana
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anastasi, Anne. Psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: MacMillan, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Ballard, K. D., & Glynn, T. Behavioral self-management in story writing with elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975, 8, 387–398.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Brigham, T. A., Graubard, P. S., & Stans, A. Analysis of the effects of sequential reinforcement contingencies on aspects of composition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 42, 27–46.Google Scholar
  4. Crockenberg, S. Creativity tests: A boon or boondogle for education. Review of Educational Research, 1972, 42, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Della-Piana, G. Research strategies for the study of revision processes in writing poetry. In C. Cooper & Lee Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure. Chapaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. Della-Piana, G. The development of a model for the systematic teaching of the writing of poetry. Final Report: Project No. 0-H-004, Grant No. 03G-8-70-0001 (058). U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Office of Education. August, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Feldman, D. Universal to unique. In Stanley Rosner & Lawrence Ediwn Abt (Eds.), Essays in creativity. Croton-On-Hudson, N. Y.: North River Press, 1974, 45–87.Google Scholar
  8. French, John W., Eckstrom, Ruth B., & Price, Leighten A. Manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. Ghiselin, B. Creative process. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  10. Glover, J., & Gary, A. L., Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976, 9, 79–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. Descriptive social reinforcement of “creative” block building by young children. In E. A. Ramp & B. L. Hopkins (Eds.), A new direction for education: Behavior analysis (1971). Lawrence, Kan.: The University of Kansas, 1971, 72–79.Google Scholar
  12. Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. Social control of form diversity and the emergence of new forms in children’s blockbuilding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 6, 209–218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Goetz, E. M., & Salmonson, M. M. The effect of general and descriptive reinforcement on “creativity” in easel painting. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education—1972. Lawrence, Kan.: The University of Kansas, 1972, 53–61.Google Scholar
  14. Goldiamond, I. Literary behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10, 527–529.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Guilford, J. P. Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 1959, 14, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holman, J., Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. The training of creativity as an operant and an examination of its generalization characteristics. In Etzel, B. C., LeBlanc, J. M., & Baer, D. M. (eds.), New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method and application. Hillsdale, N. J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, D. W., & Messick, S. The person, the product and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. In J. Kagon (Ed.), Creativity and learning. Boston: Beacon Press, 1970, 20–35.Google Scholar
  18. Kreitler, H., and Kreitler, S. Psychology of the arts. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  19. Maloney, K. B., & Hopkins, B. L. The modification of sentence structure and the relationship to subjective judgments of creativity in writing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 6, 425–433.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Mansfield, R. S., Busse, T. V., & Krepelka, E. J. The effectiveness of creativity training. Review of Educational Research, 1978, 48, 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nichols, J. G. Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 1972, 27 (8), 717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. Training generalized improvisation of tools by preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 363–380.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Skinner, B. F. Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton Century Crofts, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Torrance, E. P. Torrance tests of creative thinking. Princeton, N. J.: Personnel Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. Torrance, E. P. Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington, Mass.: Ginn, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard N. Sloane
    • 1
  • George T. Endo
    • 1
  • Gabriel M. Della-Piana
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau of Educational ResearchUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations