References
Baum, W. M. (2011a). Behaviorism, private events, and the molar view of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 185–200.
Baum, W. M. (2011b). No need for private events in a science of behavior: Response to commentaries. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 237–244.
Catania, A. C. (2011). On Baum’s public claim that he has no significant private events. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 227–236.
Hineline, P. N. (2011). Private versus inner in multiscaled interpretation. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 221–226.
Marr, M. J. (2011). Has radical behaviorism lost its right to privacy? The Behavior Analyst, 34, 213–219.
Palmer, D. C. (2011). Consideration of private events is required in a comprehensive science of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 201–207.
Rachlin, H. (2003). Privacy. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 187–201). New York: Academic/Plenum.
Rachlin, H. (2011). Baum’s private thoughts. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 209–212.
Schlinger, H. D. (1998). Of planets and cognitions: The use of deductive inference in the natural sciences and psychology. The Skeptical Inquirer, 22, 49–51.
Schlinger, H. D. (2008). Conditioning the behavior of the listener. International Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, 309–322.
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 268–277.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlinger, H.D. Introduction: Private events in a natural science of behavior. BEHAV ANALYST 34, 181–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392248
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392248