Abstract
Branch and Vollmer (2004) argue that use of the word behavior as a count noun is ungrammatical and, worse, mischaracterizes and ultimately degrades the concept of the operant. In this paper I argue that use of behavior as a count noun is a reflection of its grammatical status as a hybrid of count and mass noun. I show that such usage is widespread across colloquial, referential, and scientific documents including the writings of major figures in behavior analysis (most notably B. F. Skinner), books describing its applications, and its major journals. Finally, I argue against the assertion that such usage degrades the concept of the operant, at least in any meaningful way, and argue instead that employing eccentric definitions for ordinary words and using arcane terms to describe everyday human behavior risks diminishing the influence of behavior analysis on human affairs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baer, D. M. (1986). In application, frequency is not the only estimate of the probability of behavioral units. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 117–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1961). Child development I. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1965). Child development II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (Eds.). (1967). Child development: Readings in experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Branch, M., & Vollmer, T. (2004). Two suggestions for the verbal behavior(s) of organisms (i.e., authors). The Behavior Analyst, 27, 95–98.
Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dews, P. B. (1970). A commentary on Travis Thompson and Charles R. Schuster’s Behavioral Pharmacology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 395–406.
Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Fantino, E. (1973). Aversive control. In J. A. Nevin (Ed.), The study of behavior (pp. 239–280). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Acton, MA: Copley.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Prelec, D. (1997). A theory of addiction. In H. Rachlin & D. I. Laibson (Eds.), The matching law: Papers in psychology and economics (pp. 160–193). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Hineline, P. H. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: Its community, its functions, and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.
Johnson, E. D. (1991). The handbook of good English. New York: Washington Square Press.
Lubinski, D., & Thompson, T. (1986). Integrations of larger units of analysis. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 275–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Martin, G., & Pear, J. (1992). Behavior modification (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mazur, J. E. (1990). Learning and behavior (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
McSweeney, F, & Swindell, S. (1999). General process theories of motivation: The role of habituation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 437–457.
Miltenberger, R. G. (2001). Behavior modification (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Nevin, J. A. (1973). Problems and methods. In J. A. Nevin (Ed.), The study of behavior (pp. 3–30). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
The Oxford English dictionary (compact edition). (1971). New York: Oxford University Press.
Rachlin, H. (1980). Introduction to modern behaviorism. San Francisco: Freeman.
Reynolds, G. S. (1975). A primer of operant conditioning. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Robins, R. W, Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 117–128.
Skinner, B. F (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
Skinner, B. F (1966). Operant behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 12–32). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Skinner, B. F (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Soukhanov, A. H. (Ed.). (1992). The American Heritage dictionary (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Winokur, S. (1971). Skinner’s theory of behavior: An examination of B. F Skinner’s Contingencies of Reinforcement: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 253–259.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friman, P.C. Up with this I shall not put: 10 Reasons why I disagree with Branch and Vollmer on Behavior used as a count noun. BEHAV ANALYST 27, 99–106 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392095
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392095