Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward an operant model of power in organizations

The Behavior Analyst volume 26, pages 131–150 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to suggest that behavior analysis can help to explain social power. In this approach, an individual’s potential for influence is thought to be partially a function of his or her access to stimuli that can be used as consequences. This access can occur either through direct authority or indirectly through social networks and exchanges. Social power is also thought to be a function of an individual’s skill in delivering the stimuli in ways that will have the most impact on behavior. A number of predictions about power based on an operant approach are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

References

  • Agnew, J. L., & Redmon, W. K. (1992). Contingency-specifying stimuli: The role of “rules” in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., Simonsen, M. M., & Pierce, C. A. (1998). Effects of nonverbal behavior on perceptions of power bases. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 445–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, R. D., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1980). Punishment in organizations: A review, propositions, and research suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 5, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., & Holz, W. C. (1966). Punishment. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 380–447). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., Holz, W. C., & Hake, D. F. (1963). Fixed-ratio punishment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 141–148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A. (1965). Delayed punishment of a runway response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 60, 131–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., Kaufman, A., & Stauber, K. A. (1969). Effect of instructions and reinforcement feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 701–712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bedell, M. A., & Grace, R. C. (1997, May). Effects of reinforcement delay and magnitude on preference and resistance to change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

  • Bentall, R. P., Lowe, C. F., & Beasty, A. (1985). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: I. Developmental differences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 165–181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1974). On the nature of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (1992). Power in organizations: A social network perspective. In G. Moore & J. A. Whitt (Eds.), Research in politics and society (pp. 295–323). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brethower, D. (1982). The total performance system. In R. O’Brien, A. Dickinson, & M. Rosow (Eds.), Industrial behavior modification (pp. 350–369). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskist, W. F., Bennett, R. H., & Miller, H. L., Jr. (1981). Effects of instructional constraints on human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 217–225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Camp, D. S., Raymond, G. A., & Church, R. M. (1967). Temporal relationship between response and punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 114–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. (Ed.). (1959). Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1963). Concurrent performance: A baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 299–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. H. (1965). Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 439–444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. H., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1967). Choice and delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 67–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B. (1965). Problems of power and social change: Toward a relevant social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 21, 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. R., & Bradford, D. L. (1990). Influence without authority. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory, part I: A psychological basis for social exchange, and Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and network structures. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 38–87). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, L. W. (1982). Organizational behavior management: An overview. In L. W. Frederiksen (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior management (pp. 3–20). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies of social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. (1996). Empowerment or else. In T. Teal (Ed.), First person: Tales of management courage and tenacity (pp. 59–82). Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuqua, R. W. (1984). Comments on the applied relevance of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 381–386.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. T., & Hopkins, B. L. (1989). Multiple effects of performance-contingent pay for waitpersons. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 131–141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goltz, S. M. (1999). Can’t stop on a dime: The roles of matching and momentum in persistence of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 19(1), 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goltz, S. M., & Hietapelto, A. (in press). Using the operant and strategic contingencies models of power to understand resistance to change. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management.

  • Goodman, P. S., Devadas, R., & Hughson, T. L. (1988). Groups and productivity: Analyzing the effectiveness of self-managing teams. In J. P. Campbell & R. J. Campbell (Eds.), Productivity in organizations (pp. 295–327). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstadt, B., & Hjelle, L. A. (1973). Power to the powerless. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 190–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R. C. (1995). Independence of reinforcement delay and magnitude in concurrent chains. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 255–276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R. C., & Nevin, J. A. (1997). On the relation between preference and resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 43–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1976, December). The design of self-managing work groups (Tech. Rep. No. 11). New Haven, CT: School of Organization and Management, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, K. O., & Bollier, D. (1993). Jack Stack (A), (B), Case No. 9-993-009. Boston: The Business Enterprise Trust, Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantula, D. A. (1992). The basic importance of escalation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 579–583.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hantula, D. A. (2001). Schedules of reinforcement in organizational performance, 1971–1994: Application, analysis, and synthesis. In C. M. Johnson, W. K. Redmon, & T. C. Mawhinney (Eds.), Handbook of organizational performance (pp. 139–166). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantula, D. A., & Crowell, C. R. (1994). Behavioral contrast in a two-option analogue task of financial decision making. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 607–617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, L. J., Thompson, S., & Hayes, S. C. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and rule following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 275–291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R. L., & Azrin, N. H. (1964). Punishment by noise in an alternative response situation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 185–188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., & Pennings, J. M. (1971). Strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, F. S., & Mahoney, T. A. (1978). University budget and organization decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 454–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinings, C. R., Hickson, D. J., Pennings, J. M., & Schneck, R. E. (1974). Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 22–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1968). Leviathan. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P., & Offermann, L. R. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1987). Behaviourism and after. In A. Giddens & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 58–81). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. G., & Schuler, R. S. (1976). Leader reward and sanctions behavior in a large public utility. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Administrative Sciences, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.

  • Huy, Q. N. (2001, September). In praise of middle managers. Harvard Business Review, pp. 72–81.

  • Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S.B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instone, D., Major, B., & Bunker, B. B. (1983). Gender, self-confidence, and social influence strategies: An organizational simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M. (1972). Punishment of human behavior. American Psychologist, 27, 1033–1054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1979). Power failures in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, 57, 65–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. E., & Mazique, M. (1983). Trade routes: The manager’s network of relationships. Technical Report 22. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1975). Behavior modification in applied settings. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 374–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D. (1976). The power holders. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D. (2001). Using power: Newton’s second law. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 3–17). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., & Lane, W. P. (1962). Self confidence and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J. (1986). Applied behavior analysis and organizational behavior: Reciprocal influence of the two fields. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J. (1998). Leadership from an operant perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J., Collins, R. L., & Thoene, T. J. F. (1980). Behavioral measurement in business, industry, and government. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J., Desselles, M. L., & Bowman, E. D. (1989). Definitely not a breeze: Extending an operant model of effective supervision to teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 522–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapfl, J. E., & Gasparotto, G. (1982). Behavioral systems analysis. In L. E. Frederiksen (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior management (pp. 21–38). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., & Dossett, D. L. (1978). Designing incentive plans for unionized employees: A comparison of continuous and variable ratio schedules. Personnel Psychology, 31, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C. R. (1987). Power relinquishments versus powersharing: Theoretical clarification and empirical comparison of delegation and participation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 228–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leander, J. D., Lippman, L. G., & Meyer, M. E. (1968). Fixed interval performance as related to subjects’ verbalizations of the reinforcement contingency. The Psychological Record, 18, 469–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. F., & Horne, P. J. (1985). On the generality of behavioural principles: Human choice and the matching law. In C. F. Lowe (Ed.), Behavior analysis and contemporary psychology (pp. 97–115). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, F. C., Mauro, B. C., Boyajian, A. E., & Eckert, T. L. (1997). Effects of reinforcer quality on behavioral momentum: Coordinate applied and basic research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacKintosh, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malagodi, E. F. (1986). On radical behaviorism: A call for cultural analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Malott, R. W. (1989). The achievement of evasive goals: Control by rules describing contingencies that are not direct acting. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 269–324). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malott, R. W. (1992). A theory of rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The eternal leadership of self-managed work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1962). The business firm as a coalition. Journal of Politics, 24, 662–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., Casey, W. W., & Fadil, P. (2001). A behavioral approach to sales management. In C. M. Johnson, W. K. Redmon, & T. C. Mawhinney (Eds.), Handbook of organizational performance (pp. 327–346). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, T. C. (1975). Operant terms and concepts in the description of individual work behavior: Some problems of interpretation, application, and evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 704–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, T. C. (1982). Maximizing versus matching in people versus pigeons. Psychological Reports, 50, 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, T. C. (1988). The law of effect in the explanation of leadership, substitutes for leadership, and effects of power differentials in dyadic exchanges. University of Detroit Working Paper Series, No. 88-2.

  • Mawhinney, T. C. (1992a). Evolution of organizational cultures as selection by consequences: The Gaia hypothesis, metacontingencies, and organizational ecology. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, T. C. (Ed.). (1992b). Organizational culture, rule-governed behavior and organizational behavior management: Theoretical foundations and implications for research and practice. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, T. C. (2001). Leadership, behavior, context, and consequences. In C. M. Johnson, W. K. Redmon, & T. C. Mawhinney (Eds.), Handbook of organizational performance (pp. 191–224). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawhinney, T. C., & Gowen, C. R., III. (1991). Gainsharing and the law of effect as the matching law: A theoretical framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11(2), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (1996). Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 63–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. J. (1988). Matching theory in natural human environments. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 95–109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1959). Social conformity, deviation, and opportunity-structures: A comment on the contributions of Dubin and Cloward. American Sociological Review, 24, 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. (1960). Learning resistance to pain and fear: Effects of overlearning, exposure, and rewarded exposure in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 137–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P. R., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1987). Emergent communication networks. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 304–342). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A., Mandell, C., & Atak, J. (1983). The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Laraway, S., & Austin, J. (2001). Unconditioned and conditioned establishing operations in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(2), 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1970). Organizational analysis: A sociological view. New York: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Konrad, A. (1991). The effects of individual power on earnings. Work and Occupations, 18, 385–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Moore, W. L. (1980). Power in university budgeting: A replication and extension. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 637–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1974). Organization decision making as a political process: The case of a university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M. (1982). Determinants of a supervisor’s use of rewards and punishments: A literature review and suggestions for future research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 58–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier’s substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 380–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven’s bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. D., Grover, R. A., & Huber, V. L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behavior: Fact or fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 21–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. D., & Skov, R. (1982). Effects of leader contingent and non-contingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 810–821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poling, A. (2001). Comments regarding Olson, Laraway, and Austin (2001). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(2), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poling, A., & Foster, M. (1993). The matching law and organizational behavior management revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 14(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, W. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1972). Decision theory analysis of social power. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. K., & Mawhinney, T. C. (1991). Superior-subordinate dyads: Dependence of leader effectiveness on mutual reinforcement contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 105–118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Redmon, W. K., & Agnew, J. A. (1991). Organizational behavior analysis in the United States: A view from the private sector. In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 125–139). New York: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmon, W. K., & Lockwood, K. (1987). The matching law and organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 8(1), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmon, W. K., & Wilk, L. A. (1991). Organizational behavior analysis in the United States: Public sector organizations. In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 107–123). New York: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organization chart (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1938). Power. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making—The case of a university. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 19, 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, R. M. (1971). A timeout procedure for the modification of speech content—A case study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2, 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, J. (1965). Social power. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 177–218). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A., Hinkin, T. R., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1991). Can ipsative and single-item measures produce erroneous results in field studies of French and Raven’s (1959) five bases of power? An empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. (1978). Psychology of learning and behavior. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, J. E., Slocum, J. W., Buda, R., & Thompson, R. C. (1990). Effects of corporate sponsorship and departmental power on career tournaments. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 578–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1989). Coercion and its fallout. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, H. P., Jr., & Szilagyi, A. D. (1975). Leader reward behavior and subordinate satisfaction and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 426–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. (1997, May). The ideal free distribution: An experimental test with humans competing for money. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

  • Solomon, R. L. (1964). Punishment. American Psychologist, 19, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1982). Behavioral approaches to occupational health and safety. In L. W. Frederiksen (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior management (pp. 505–538). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B., McCann, K. B., & Harris, T. C. (2001). The safe performance approach to preventing job-related illness and injury. In C. M. Johnson, W. K. Redmon, & T. C. Mawhinney (Eds.), Handbook of organizational performance (pp. 277–302). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teerlink, R. (2000, July–August). Harley’s leadership U-turn. Harvard Business Review, pp. 43–52.

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. (1989). Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis: A theoretical and experimental history. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 97–118). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vrendenburgh, D. J., & Maurer, J. G. (1984). A process framework of organizational politics. Human Relations, 37, 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. A., Rubin, P. A., & Callahan, T. J. (1988). Incentive payment and nonmanagerial productivity: An interrupted time series analysis of magnitude and trend. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. I. (1968). Power, visibility, and conformity in formal organizations. American Sociological Review, 6, 951–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1970). Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 391–394.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Welbourne, T. M., & Trevor, C. O. (2002). The roles of departmental and position power in job evaluation. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, D. (1995, June). Open book management special report: Before and after. Inc., pp. 44–50.

  • Williams, B. A. (1988). Reinforcement, choice, and response strength. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 167–244). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1991). The importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Economics, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Avenue, Houghton, Michigan, 49931, USA

    Sonia M. Goltz

Authors
  1. Sonia M. Goltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia M. Goltz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goltz, S.M. Toward an operant model of power in organizations. BEHAV ANALYST 26, 131–150 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392071

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392071

Key words

  • social power
  • power holder
  • degree of power
  • control of reinforcers
  • social networks

Search

Navigation