The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 267–277 | Cite as

Women in applied behavior analysis

  • Frances K. McSweeney
  • Patricia Donahoe
  • Samantha Swindell
Article

Abstract

The status of women in applied behavior analysis was examined by comparing the participation of women in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA) to their participation in three similar journals. For all journals, the percentage of articles with at least one female author, the percentage of authors who are female, and the percentage of articles with a female first author increased from 1978 to 1997. Participation by women in JABA was equal to or greater than participation by women in the comparison journals. However, women appeared as authors on papers in special sections of Behavior Modification substantially more often when the editor was female than when the editor was male. In addition, female membership on the editorial boards of JABA, Behavior Modification, and Behaviour Research and Therapy failed to increase from 1978 to 1997. We conclude that a “glass ceiling” reduces the participation of women at the highest levels of applied behavior analysis and related fields.

Key words

participation of women gender equity glass ceiling applied behavior analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benokraitis, N. V. (1998). Working in the ivory basement: Subtle sex discrimination in higher education. In L. H. Collins, J. C. Chrisler, & K. Quina (Eds.), Career strategies for women in academe: Arming Athena (pp. 3–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Buffardi, L. C, & Nichols, J. A. (1981). Citation impact, acceptance rate, and APA journals. American Psychologist, 36, 1453–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative disadvantage? Journal of Higher Education, 57, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dovidio, J. E, & Gaertner, S. L. (1999). Reducing prejudice: Combating intergroup biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dreher, G. E., & Cox, T. H., Jr. (1996). Race, gender, and opportunity: A study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 297–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hogan, J. D., & Sexton, V. S. (1991). Women and the American Psychological Association. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iwata, B. A., & Lent, C. E. (1984). Participation by women in behavior analysis: Some recent data on authorship of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 77–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Keita, G. P., Houston, S., Wisnieski, L. A., & Cameron, L. (1999). Women in the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  10. Laties, V. G. (1987). Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior: The first thirty years (1957–1987). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 495–512.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Matthews, K. A., & Rodin, J. (1989). Women’s changing work roles: Impact on health, family, and public policy. American Psychologist, 44, 1389–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McSweeney, F. K., & Swindell, S. (1998). Women in the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 193–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Morrison, A. M., & Von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Myers, D. L. (1993). Participation by women in behavior analysis. II: 1992. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 75–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Neef, N. A. (1993). Response to Myers on participation of women in behavior analysis: Right problem, wrong source. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 357–359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Over, R. (1981). Representation of women on the editorial boards of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 36, 885–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pion, G. M., Mednick, M. T., Astin, H. S., Hall, C. C. I., Kenkel, M. B., Keita, G. P., Kohout, J. L., & Kelleher, J. C. (1996). The shifting gender composition of psychology: Trends and implications for the discipline. American Psychologist, 51, 509–528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Poling, A., Grossett, D., Fulton, B., Roy, S., Beechler, S., & Wittkopp, C. J. (1983). Participation by women in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 145–152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Richards, E. D., Cox, B. J., & Norton, R. (1998). Leading researchers and institutions in behavior analysis and therapy in the 1990s. The Behavior Therapist, 21, 113–115.Google Scholar
  20. Riger, S., & Galligan, P. (1980). Women in management: An exploration of competing paradigms. American Psychologist, 35, 902– 910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rose, S., & Danner, M. J. E. (1998). Money matters: The art of negotiation for women faculty. In L. H. Collins, J. C. Chrisler, & K. Quina (Eds.), Career strategies for women in academe: Arming Athena (pp. 157–186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Russo, N. F, & Denmark, F L. (1984). Women, psychology, and public policy: Selected issues. American Psychologist, 39, 1161–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Russo, N. F, Olmedo, E. L., Stapp, J., & Fulcher, R. (1981). Women and minorities in psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 1315– 1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Syverson, P. D. (1982). Two decades of doctorates in psychology: A comparison with national trends. American Psychologist, 37, 1203–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wenneras, C, & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387, 341–343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zuckerman, H., & Cole, J. R. (1975). Women in American science. Minerva, 13, 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances K. McSweeney
    • 1
  • Patricia Donahoe
    • 1
  • Samantha Swindell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations