Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 173–190 | Cite as

Varieties of scientific explanation

Article

Abstract

Scientific explanations often take one of two forms. The first is instantiation. According to this form, an event is said to be explained when it can be expressed as some particular value of a variable in a general proposition, equation, or law. One example of instantiation in psychology is Stevens’ psychophysical law. Another is the matching law in the experimental analysis of behavior. A second form of explanation is a deduction from a covering law. According to this form, an event is said to be explained when its description follows as a valid logical deduction in an argument that has a covering law as one premise and a statement of antecedent conditions as another premise. Examples of covering law explanations in psychology are found in traditional neobehaviorism, which sought to develop laws of behavior so that observed behavioral events could be explained as deductions therefrom. Strictly speaking, neither form of explanation is consistent with behavior-analytic explanations derived from Skinner’s radical behaviorism, which emphasize the pragmatic sources and contributions of the verbal behavior regarded as explanatory.

Key words

explanation instantiation covering law radical behaviorism methodological behaviorism verbal behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baum, W. M. (1974a). Definition in behavioral science: A review of B. B. Wolman’s Dictionary of Behavioral Science. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 445–451.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum, W. M. (1974b). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and under-matching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, W. M. (1979). Matching, undermatch-ing, and overmatching in studies of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 269–281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  5. Braithwaite, R. B. (1953). Scientific explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Catania, A. C, & Harnad, S. (Eds.). (1988). The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and controversies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, S. R. (1987). Quantitative order in B. F. Skinner’s early research program, 1928–1931. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 47–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Day, W. F, Jr. (1969a). On certain similarities between the Philosophical Investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the operationism of B. F Skinner. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 489–506.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Day, W. F, Jr. (1969b). Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 315–328.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kantor, J. R. (1938). The operational principle in the physical and psychological sciences. Psychological Record, 2, 1–32.Google Scholar
  12. Kantor, J. R. (1945). Psychology and logic (Vol. 1). Bloomington, IN: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kendler, H. H., & Spence, J. T. (1971). Tenets of neobehaviorism. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence (pp. 11–40). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  14. Killeen, P. R. (1972). The matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 489–495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Killeen, P. R. (1976). The schemapiric view: Notes on S. S. Stevens’ philosophy and Psy-chophysics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 123–128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Logue, A. W., Rodriguez, M. L., Peña-Correal, T. E., & Mauro, B. C. (1984). Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 53–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Mach, E. (1974). Science of mechanics (T J. McCormack, Trans.). LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1883)Google Scholar
  18. Marx, M. H. (1951). Psychological theory. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Moore, J. (1975). On the principle of operationism in a science of behavior. Behaviorism, 3, 120–138.Google Scholar
  20. Moore, J. (1981). On mentalism, methodological behaviorism, and radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 9, 55–77.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, J. (1983). On molarism and matching. Psychological Record, 33, 313–336.Google Scholar
  22. Moore, J. (1984). On behaviorism, knowledge, and causal explanation. Psychological Record, 34, 73–97.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, J. (1990a). On the “causes” of behavior. Psychological Record, 40, 469–480.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, J. (1990b). On mentalism, privacy, and behaviorism. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 19–36.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, J. (1992). On private events and theoretical terms. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 13, 329–346.Google Scholar
  26. Moore, J. (1996). On the relation between behaviorism and cognitive psychology. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17, 345–368.Google Scholar
  27. Moore, J. (1998). On behaviorism, theories, and hypothetical constructs. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 19, 215–242.Google Scholar
  28. Pitt, J. C. (Ed.). (1988). Theories of explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rachlin, H. C. (1971). On the tautology of the matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 249–251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Russell, B. (1932). Mysticism and logic. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
  31. Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Salmon, W. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  34. Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277, 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skinner, B. F. (1961). Cumulative record (enlarged ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skinner, B. F. (1964). Behaviorism at fifty. In T. W. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology (pp. 79–108). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, B. F. (1972). Cumulative record. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  42. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  43. Skinner, B. F. (1979). The shaping of a behave-iorist. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  44. Skinner, B. F (1986). Some thoughts about the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 229–235.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, L. D. (1995). Inquiry nearer the source: Bacon, Mach, and The Behavior of Organisms. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on B. F. Skinner and contemporary behaviorism (pp. 39–50). West-port, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  47. Staddon, J. E. R. (1968). Spaced responding and choice: A preliminary analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 669–682.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Stevens, S. S. (1939). Psychology and the science of science. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 221–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Turner, M. B. (1967). Philosophy and the science of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  51. Wallace, W A. (1972). Causality and scientific explanation (Vol. 1). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  52. Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations