References
Day, W. F. (1969). Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 315–328.
Day, W. F. (1971, September). Methodological problems in the analysis of behavior controlled by private events: Some unusual recommendations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Day, W. F. (1976). Contemporary behaviorism and the concept of intention. In J. K. Cole & W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1975 (pp. 67–131). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Day, W. F. (1983). On the difference between radical and methodological behaviorism. Behaviorism, 11, 89–102.
Epstein, R. (1984). The case for praxics. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 101–119.
Leigland, S. M. (1984). In response: Can radical behaviorism rescue psychology? The Behavior Analyst, 7, 73–74.
Miller, H. L. (1983). More than promissory? Reflections on the once and future experimental analysis of human behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 551–564.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leigland, S. Praxics and the Case for Radical Behaviorism. BEHAV ANALYST 8, 127–128 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391920
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391920