Abstract
The National Commission on Excellence in Education was charged with the responsibility for examining the quality of education in America. Its report, “A Nation at Risk” (1983), contained a set of alarming facts about the status of American education. These were followed by a set of five major recommendations for improving the situation. They related to (1) content, (2) standards and expectations, (3) time, (4) teaching, and (5) leadership and support. The present paper examines each of the set of recommendations from a behavior analytic perspective. It notes what the field of behavior analysis can say on the subject now; what it potentially might address and remediate at this time; what it might explore and predict; and in general what it can do to make a difference. Behavior analysis has made many important discoveries that should be communicated to educators and the public, and it has tools and concepts for further contributing toward the improvement of education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alessi, G. (1983.) A “Modest Proposal” for educational excellence. The Direct Instruction News, Spring, pp. 24–26.
Barrera, R., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1983). An alternating treatment comparison of oral and total communication program with echolalic autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 379–394.
Becker, W. C., & Carnine, D. W. (1981). Direct instruction: A behavior theory model for comprehensive educational intervention with the disadvantaged. In S. W. Bijou & R. Ruiz (Eds.), Behavior modification: Contributions to education (pp. 145–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carnine, D. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199–206.
Etzel, B. C., Bickel, W. K., Stella, M. E., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1982). The assessment of problem-solving skills of atypical children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 187–206.
Fowler, S. A., & Baer, S. M. (1981). “Do I have to be good all day?” The timing of delayed reinforcement as a factor in generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 13–24.
Frankowsky, R., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1978). Individual and group contingencies and collateral social behaviors. Behavior Therapy, 9, 313–327.
Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press, Inc.
Greenwood, C. R., Hops, H., & Walker, H. M. (1977). Maintenance of changes in student behavior within the same school year. Behavior Therapy, 8, 631–638.
Greer, R. D., & Polirstok, S. R. (1982). Collateral gains and short-term maintenance in reading and on-task responses by some inner-city adolescents as a function of their use of social reinforcement while tutoring. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 123–139.
Homme, L., Csanyi, A. P., Gonzales, M. A., & Rechs, J. R. (1970). How to use contingency contracting in the classroom. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Johnson, K. R., & Ruskin, R. S. (1977). Behavioral instruction: An evaluative review. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Keller, F. S. (1968). Good-bye, teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.
Litow, L., & Pumroy, D. K. (1975). A brief report of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341–347.
Lowe, C. F., Beasty, A., & Bentall, R. P. (1983). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: Infant performance on fixed-interval schedules. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 157–164.
Martin, G. L., & Osborne, J. G. (1980). Helping in the community: Behavioral applications. New York: Plenum Press.
Mayer, G. R., Butterworth, T., Nafpaktitis, M., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1983). Preventing school vandalism and improving discipline: A three-year study. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 355–370.
McReynolds, W. T., & Church, A. (1973). Self control, study skills development and counseling approaches to the improvement of study behavior. Behavior Research and Therapy, 11, 233–235.
The National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Reese, E. P., Howard, J. S., & Rosenberger, P. B. (1977). Behavioral prodedures for assessing visual capacities in nonverbal subjects. In B. C. Etzell, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method, and application (pp. 279–301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rhode, G., Morgan, D. P., & Young, R. K. (1983). Generalization and maintenance of treatment gains of behaviorally handicapped students from resource rooms to regular classrooms using self-evaluation procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 171–188.
Richards, R. W. (1981). A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 145–152.
Saudargas, R. W., Madsen, C. H., & Scott, J. W. (1977). Differential effects of fixed- and variable-time feedback on production rates of elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 673–678.
Skinner, B. F. (1984) The shame of American education. American Psychologist, 39, 947–954.
Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
Stokes, T. F., Fowler, S. A., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Training preschool children to recruit natural communities of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 285–303.
Sulzer, B., Hunt, S., Ashby, E., Koniarski, C., & Krams, M. (1971). Increasing rate and percentage correct in reading and spelling in a class of slow readers by means of a token system. In E. A. Ramp & B. L. Hopkins (Eds.), New directions in education: Behavior analysis (pp. 262–277). Lawrence, KS: Follow Through, Department of Human Development, University of Kansas.
Sulzer, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1972). Behavior modification procedures for school personnel. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (in press). Achieving educational excellence with behavioral strategies. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Walker, H. M., & Hops, H. (1979). The CLASS program for acting out children: R & D procedures, program outcomes and implementation issues. School Psychology Digest, 8, 370–381.
Weisberg, P., & Waldrop, P. B. (1972). Fixed interval work habits of Congress. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 93–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Based on an invited address at the Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Nashville, Tennessee, May 31, 1984.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sulzer-Azaroff, B. A Behaviorist’s Response to the Report of the National Commission on Excellence in Education. BEHAV ANALYST 8, 29–38 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391910
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391910