Abstract
This paper reports some puzzling results from a token economy in an inpatient behavioral treatment facility. A seemingly insignificant change from poker chip tokens to sticker tokens produced substantial increases in problem behavior—as measured by frequency of time-outs for problem behavior. The results are puzzling because it is generally assumed that qualitative aspects of the tokens—such as whether or not they are handled—should not matter. What should matter is simply the correlation between tokens and other reinforcers for which they are exchanged. Indeed, the successful use of check marks, stickers, and stars in scores of token systems over the years shows pretty clearly that stickers and other nonhandled tokens are up to the job.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Conyers, C., Miltenberger, R., Maki, A., Barenz, R., Jurgens, M., Sailer, A., Haugen, M., & Kopp, B. (2004). A comparison of response cost and differential reinforcement of other behavior to reduce disruptive behavior in a preschool classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 411–415.
Flaherty, C. F. (1982). Incentive contrast: A review of behavioral changes following shifts in reward. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10, 409–440.
Hackenberg, T. D. (2009). Token reinforcement: A review and analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 257–286.
Iwata, B. A., & Bailey, J. S. (1974). Reward versus cost token systems: An analysis of the effects on student and teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 567–576.
Kelleher, R. T. (1958). Fixed-ratio schedules of conditioned reinforcement in chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 281–289.
Malagodi, E. F. (1967). Fixed-ratio schedules of token reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 8, 469–470.
McLaughlin, T. F., & Malaby, J. (1972). Intrinsic reinforcers in a classroom token economy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 263–270.
Pellegrini, S., Seal, M. F. L., & Papini, M. R. (2008). Scaling relative incentive value: Different adjustments to incentive downshift in pigeons and rats. Behavioural Processes, 79, 182–188.
Pietras, C. J., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2005). Response-cost punishment via token-loss with pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 69, 343–356.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hackenberg, T.D. Response to Ahrendt, Houlihan, and Buchanan. Behav Analysis Practice 6, 36–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391802
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391802