Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 301–311 | Cite as

The AFL-CIO Split: Does It Really Matter?

  • Gary Chaison
Article

Abstract

In 2005, the AFL-CIO split and the Change to Win Coalition (CtW) was founded because of the personal ambition of dissident union leaders and their frustration with the severe and continuing decline in union membership. The CtW was build on a shared faith that only afresh start could lead the unions out of their crisis. But a convincing case has not been made that the seceding unions would be more successful outside of AFL-CIO. When it is seen against the backdrop of the crisis in the labor movement and the enormity of the task of union organizing and revival, the AFL-CIO split does not really matter.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AFL-CIO. Application Process for Solidarity Charters <www.aflcio.org>, 2006a.Google Scholar
  2. AFL-CIO. Constitution <www.aflcio.org>, 2006b.Google Scholar
  3. AFL-CIO. News for Working Families: AFL-CIO Rolls Out Solidarity Charter Program to Reunite Local Labor Movements <www.aflcio.org>, 2006c.Google Scholar
  4. AFL-CIO. “Unity on the Ground.” AFL-CIO Press Releases, Speeches and Testimony <www.aflcio.org>. May 4, 2006d.Google Scholar
  5. Bain, George S. and Farouk Elsheikh. Union Growth and the Business Cycle: An Econometric Analysis. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Bureau of National Affairs. “Five Unions to Form Coalition to Pressure AFL-CIO Leadership, Push for Change.” Daily Labor Report, <www.changetowin.org/press/DLR061505.html>, June 16, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. Chaison, Gary. When Unions Merge. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. Chaison, Gary. Union Mergers in Hard Times: The View from Five Countries. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. Chaison, Gary. Unions in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006b.Google Scholar
  10. Chaison, Gary and Dileep G. Dhavale. “The Changing Scope of Union Organizing.” Journal of Labor Research 11 (Summer 1990): 307–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Change to Win. Compare the Difference, <www.changetowin.org>, September, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Change to Win. Change to Win Constitution, <www.workinglife.org/FOL/news/CTWConstitution/FOL/news/CTWConstitution>, 2006a.Google Scholar
  13. Change to Win. Strategic Organizing Center, <www.changetowin.org>, June 2006b.Google Scholar
  14. Craver, Martha Lynn. “Are Unions Stronger after 2005 Split?” Kiplinger Business Forecasts, 2006 (May 24, 2006): 526.Google Scholar
  15. Edsall, Thomas B. “Anna Burger to Head Breakaway Labor Group.” Washington Post, September 25, 2005a.Google Scholar
  16. Edsall, Thomas B. “Split of Top Unions Raises Debates on Labor Day.” Washington Post, September 5, 2005b.Google Scholar
  17. Erickson, Christopher L., Catherine Fisk, Ruth Milkman, Daniel J.B. Mitchell, and Kent Wong. “Justice for Janitors in Los Angeles and Beyond.” In Phanindra V. Wunnava, ed. The Changing Role of Unions: New Forms of Representation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2004, pp. 22–58.Google Scholar
  18. Fantasia, Rick and Kim Voss. Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, Richard B. “The Road to Union Renaissance in the United States.” In Phanindra V. Wunnava, ed. The Changing Role of Unions. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp, 2004, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  20. Greenhouse, Steven. “Union Leaders See Grim News in Labor Study.” New York Times, October 13, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. Greenhouse, Steven. “Local Leaders Sound Do-or-Die Warning.” New York Times, February 19, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Greenhouse, Steven. “Breakaway Unions Start New Federation.” New York Times, September 28, 2005a.Google Scholar
  23. Greenhouse, Steven. “Five Unions to Create a Coalition on Growth.” New York Times, June 13, 2005b.Google Scholar
  24. Greenhouse, Steven. “4 Major Unions Plan to Boycott AFL-CIO Event.” New York Times, July 25, 2005c.Google Scholar
  25. Greenhouse, Steven. “Labor Debates the Future of a Fractured Movement.” New York Times, July 27, 2005d.Google Scholar
  26. Greenhouse, Steven. “After Quitting the AFL-CIO, Group Suggests Reunion of Sorts.” New York Times, April 25, 2006a.Google Scholar
  27. Greenhouse, Steven. “National Briefing Washington: Committee to Aid Union Cooperation.” New York Times, May 10, 2006b.Google Scholar
  28. Heiser, Scott, Dan Roberts, and Holly Yeager. “Union Blues.” Financial Times, July 28, 2005.Google Scholar
  29. Hirsch, Barry T. and David A. Macpherson. Unionstats.com: Union Membership and Coverage Database from the CPS, <www.unionstats.com>, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. Katz, Harry C., Rosemary Batt, and Jeffrey H. Keefe. “The Revitalization of the CWA: Integrating Collective Bargaining, Political Action, and Organizing.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56 (July 2003): 573–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kinsman, Michael. “AFL-CIO Joins Breakaway Unions at Rally in San Diego.” San Diego Union-Tribune, April 27, 2006.Google Scholar
  32. Knowles, Francine. “Union Takes Message to TV: Renegade Coalition Runs Ads Spotlighting Eroding Middle Class.” Chicago Sun-Times, April 25, 2006.Google Scholar
  33. Kutalik, Chris. “What Does the AFL-CIO Split Mean?” Labor Notes, <www.labornotes.org/archives/2005/09/articles/a.shtml>, September 2005.Google Scholar
  34. “Labor Union Split.” Online NewsHour, <www.pbs.org/newshour/newshour>, June 25, 2005.Google Scholar
  35. Lewis, Diane E. “Union Group Looks to Squeeze AFL-CIO in Row.” Boston Globe, May 4, 2006.Google Scholar
  36. Masters, Marick. Unions at the Crossroads: Strategic Membership, Financial and Political Perspectives. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1997.Google Scholar
  37. Moberg, David. “The Lay of Labor’s New Land.” In These Times, <http://inthesetimes.com/site/main/ articles/2368/site/main/articles/2368>, October 26, 2005a.Google Scholar
  38. Moberg, David. “Look Who’s Walking.” The Nation, <http://thenation.com/doc/20050801/moberg/doc/20050801/moberg>, July 26, 2005b.Google Scholar
  39. Napsha, Joe and C.M. Mortimer. “Labor Changes Little Since Split.” Pittsburgh Tribune Review, <www.pittsburghlive.com/pitttsburghtrib/pitttsburghtrib>, April 4, 2006.Google Scholar
  40. Raine, George. “Taking Stock of Organized Labor: Unions Face Challenges on a Variety of Fronts.” San Francisco Chronicle, September 4, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. Reich, Robert B. “Divided, They Stand—Maybe Even Taller.” Washington Post, July 31, 2005.Google Scholar
  42. Rose, Joseph B. and Gary Chaison. “The Macrodeterminants of Union Growth and Decline.” In G. Strauss, D. G. Gallagher and J. Fiorito, eds. The State of the Unions. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1991, pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
  43. Rose, Joseph B. and Gary Chaison. “Linking Union Density and Union Effectiveness.” Industrial Relations 35 (January 1996): 78–105.Google Scholar
  44. Rudy, Preston. “‘Justice for Janitors’ Not ‘Compensation for Custodians’: The Political Context and Organizing in San Jose and Sacramento.” In Ruth Milkman and Kim Voss, eds. Rebuilding Labor: Organizing and Organizers in the New Union Movement. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 2004. pp. 133–149.Google Scholar
  45. Simmers, Tim. “Despite Split, Labor Leaders Seek Unity.” San Mateo County Times, <http://laborcenter.berekeley.edu/press/sanmateo_sept05.shtml/press/sanmateo_sept05.shtml>, September 3, 2005.Google Scholar
  46. Wheeler, Hoyt N. The Future of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Chaison
    • 1
  1. 1.Clark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations