Abstract
On-Going Change in English Modality: Emancipation Through Frequency The English modal expressions BE going to, HAVE got to, and want to are often contracted to gonna, gotta, and wanna in spoken language. These contracted forms have gained both in frequency and conventionality in recent times.
In this article, I present an investigation into the status of the contractions between phonetic reduction and lexicality. The contracted forms are observed to undergo a process of ›emancipation‹, that is, they move towards increasing conceptual independence from their source forms, with the most frequent one, gonna, leading the way. Emancipation is therefore construed as a frequency effect. The study is based on American English data, both from spontaneous spoken language and a diachronic corpus.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Literature
Bailey, Guy: »Real and Apparent time«. In: J. K. Chambers/ Peter Trudgill/ Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.): The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, Mass. 2002, pp. 312–332.
Bybee, Joan: »From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition«. In: Language 82/4 (2006), pp. 711–733.
Jurafsky, Daniel/ Bell, Alan/ Fosler-Lussier, Eric/ Girand, Cynthia/ Raymond, William: »Reduction of English function words in Switchboard«. In: Proceedings of ICSLP-98. Sydney 1998.
Haiman, John: »Iconicity and syntactic change«. In: R. E. Asher (ed.): The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford 1994, pp. 1633–1637.
Jankowski, Bridget: »A transatlantic perspective of variation and change in English deontic modality«. In: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23/2 (2004), pp. 85–113.
Leech, Geoffrey: »Modality on the Move: the English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1992«. In: Roberta Facchinetti/ Manfred Krug/ Frank Palmer (eds.): Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin 2003, p. 223–240.
Lorenz, David: »From reduction to emancipation: Is gonna a word?«. In: Hilde Hasselgård/ Jarle Ebeling/ Signe Oksefjell Ebeling (eds.): Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis. Amsterdam 2013.
Palmer, Frank: »Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues«. In: Roberta Facchinetti/ Manfred Krug/ Frank Palmer (eds.): Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin 2003, pp. 1–17.
Rohdenburg, Günter: »Cognitive complexity and increases grammatical explicitness in English«. In: Cognitive Linguistics 7/2 (1996), pp. 149–182.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt: »On operationalizing complexity«. In: 7es Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles (2004), pp. 1031–1038.
Tagliamonte, Sali A./ D’Arcy, Alexandra: »The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective«. In: English World-Wide 28/1 (2007), pp. 47–87.
Webster’s New World College Dictionary. Fourth edition. Ed. by Michael E. Agnes, David B. Guralnik. Cleveland 2004.
Corpora
Davies, Mark: The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Available online: http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/ (2010).
Du Bois, John W./ Engelbertson, Robert/ Chafe, Wallace L./ Meyer, Charles/ Thompson, Sandra A./ Martey, Nii: Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English. Parts 1–4. Philadelphia 2000–2005.
Simpson, R. C./ Briggs, S. L./ Ovens, J./ Swales, J. M.: The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lorenz, D. On-Going Change in English Modality: Emancipation Through Frequency. Z Literaturwiss Linguistik 43, 33–48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379871
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379871