Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Activitas Nervosa Superior
  3. Article

Knowledge, Science and Death: The Theory of Brain-Sign

  • Ideas & Opinion
  • Open access
  • Published: 20 February 2017
  • volume 56, pages 105–120 (2014)
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Activitas Nervosa Superior
Knowledge, Science and Death: The Theory of Brain-Sign
Download PDF
  • Philip Clapson1 
  • 396 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Cite this article

Abstract

In today’s paradigmatic climate, the possibility of knowledge, and therefore science, still depends upon our being conscious. However, no scientifically accepted account of consciousness exists. In recent years I have developed the theory of brain-sign which replaces consciousness as a wholly physical neural condition. The first tenet is that the brain is a causal organ, not a knowledge organ. The second is that brain-sign, used in inter-neural communication for uncertain or imprecise collective action, derives at each moment from the causal orientation of the brain. Signs are ubiquitous bio-physical entities. Thus there is no problematic dualism, consciousness and world. We now have two accounts of the brain phenomenon. The first (consciousness) is an inexplicable physical anomaly. The second (brain-sign) belongs in the physical universe, and fulfils a crucial neurobiological function. With brain-sign theory we even ‘discover’ that we do not know we are alive or will die.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Death and Consciousness

Chapter © 2022

Communication Without Consciousness: The Theory of Brain-Sign

Article Open access 01 September 2016

Philip Clapson

From Consciousness to Brain-Sign: a Neurobiological Reconstruction

Article Open access 25 September 2020

Philip Clapson

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Baars, B. (1997). In The Theatre of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, 292–309. http://www.imprint.co.uk/theatre.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M., Hacker, P. (2003). The Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (1995–7). Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness. In Explaining Consciousness: The Hard Problem, 9–32. Ed. J. Shear. A Bradford Book, MIT Press, (and the Journal of Consciousness Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. (1981) Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 2, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. (2007). Neurophilosophy at Work. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clapson, P. (2012). The world without knowledge: The Theory of Brain-Sign. Durham University: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3560/

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens. William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman, D. (2011). Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. Canongate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. & Tononi, G. (2000). Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology,67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P. (2005). Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S. (2008) The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mind reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 1–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1993). Afterwords. In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. Ed. P. Horwich. A Bradford Book, MIT Press, 311–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, Q. (1965). In Husserl, E. Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. Trans. Quentin Lauer. Harper Tourchbooks.

  • Machamer, P (2009). Learning, Neuroscience, and the Return of Behaviorism. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Ed. J. Bickle. Oxford University Press, 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mareschal, D., Johnson, M., Sirios, S., Spratling, M., Thomas, M., Westerman, G. (2007). Neuroconstructivism: How the Brain Constructs Cognition. Volume One. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (1989). Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?. Mind, 98: 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1961). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Trans. R.J. Hollingdale. Penguin.

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Particularly Part Three: Personal Identity Chapter 13. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind, Oxford Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, L. (2013). The Cognitive-Emotional Brain. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (2012). Open Minds: The Social Making of Agency and Intentionality. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de (1970). On the Nature of Language, reproduced in Lane, M. (ed.) Structuralism, A Reader, Jonathan Cape. From Course in General Linguistics (1959) trans. W. Baskin, Philosophical Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. (2011). The Language of Thought: a New Direction. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1998). The Mystery of Consciousness. Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (2007). Putting Consciousness Back in the Brain. In Neuroscience and Philosophy. Columbia University Press, 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (2011). The Mystery of Consciousness Continues. The New York Review of Books, June 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Harvard University Press. (First published in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G.R., Echterhoff, G. (2010). (eds) Grounding Sociality: Neurons, Mind and Culture. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth, A.K., Barrett, A.D., & Barnett L. (2011). Causal density and integrated information as measures of conscious level. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.369: 3748–3767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, N., et al. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18,4: 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (2012). The Social Conquest of Earth. Liveright Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, UK

    Philip Clapson

Authors
  1. Philip Clapson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Clapson.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clapson, P. Knowledge, Science and Death: The Theory of Brain-Sign. Act Nerv Super 56, 105–120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379615

Download citation

  • Received: 10 September 2014

  • Accepted: 30 October 2014

  • Published: 20 February 2017

  • Issue Date: December 2014

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379615

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Key words

  • Brain-sign
  • Consciousness
  • Collective action
  • Eliminativism
  • Inter-neural communication
  • Interorganism communication
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature