The Neuroscience of Divergent Thinking

Abstract

Creativity plays a role in innovation, development, and health. Recent research has used neuroscientific methods to study originality, novelty, insight, divergent thinking, and other processes related to creative mental activity. Findings indicate that both hemispheres are involved in divergent thinking, which is accompanied by both event-related increases and decreases in the neural activation. Divergent thinking seems to be associated with high neural activation in the central, temporal, and parietal regions, indications of semantic processing and re-combination of semantically related information. Most of the research in this area has been done in the last 10 years, and very likely refining and standardizing DT testing and scoring will lead to additional insights about creativity.

References

  1. Abraham, A., Thybusch, K.V. Pieritz, K. & Hermann, C. (2013). Gender differences in creative thinking: behavioral and fMRI findings. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 8(1), 39–51. doi: 10.1007/sll682-013-9241-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arden, R., Chavez, R. S., Grazioplene, R. & Jung, R. E. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214(2), 143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Häberling, I. S. & Corballis, M. C. (2011). Magical ideation, creativity, handedness, and cerebral asymmetries: A combined behavioural and fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2896–2903. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bendat, J. S. & Piersol, A. G. (2000). Random data. Analysis and measurement procedures. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benedek, M., Bergner, S., Konen, T., Fink, A. & Neubauer, A. C. (2011). EEG alpha synchronization is related to top-down processing in convergent and divergent thinking. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3505–3511. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F. & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. Neurolmage, 88, 125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benedek, M., Schickel, R. J., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Alpha power increases in right parietal cortex reflects focused internal attention. Neuropsychologia 56, 393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 19(12), 2767–2796. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 634–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Danko, S. G., Shemyakina, N. V., Nagornova, Zh. V. & Starchenko, M. G. (2009). Comparison of the effects of the subjective complexity and verbal creativity on EEG spectral power parameters. Human Physiology, 35, 381–383. doi: 10.1134/S0362119709030153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11 (6), 1011–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietrich, A. & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848. doi: 10.1037/a0019749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dow, G. T. & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eichenbaum, H. (2002). The cognitive neuroscience of memory: An introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M. & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. Neurolmage, 59, 1783–1794. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fakhri, M., Sikaroodi, H., Maleki, F., Oghabian, F. M. & Hosein Ghanaati, H. (2012). Age-related frontal hyperactivation observed across different working memory tasks: An fMRI study. Behavioural Neurology, 25, 351–361. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-120280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 46–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). Divergent thinking training is related to frontal electroencephalogram alpha synchronization. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2241–2246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fink, A., Benedek, M., Grabner, R. H., Staudt, B. & Neubauer, A. C. (2007). Creativity meets neuroscience: Experimental tasks for the neuroscientific study of creative thinking. Methods, 42, 68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2008). Eysenck meets Martindale: The relationship between extraversion and originality from the neuroscientific perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 299–310. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fink, A., Graif, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2009). Brain correlates underlying creative thinking: EEG alpha activity in professional vs. novice dancers. Neurolmage, 46, 854–862. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Hauswirth, V., Fally, M., Neuper, C., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2009). The creative brain: Investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 734–748. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., & Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study. Neurolmage, 52, 1687–1695. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fink, A., Schwab, D., & Papousek, I. (2011). Sensitivity of EEG upper alpha activity to cognitive and affective creativity interventions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 82, 233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Ischebeck, A., Elisabeth, M. Weiss, E. M. & Ebner, F. (2012). Stimulating Creativity via the Exposure to Other People’s Ideas. Human Brain Mapping, 33 2603–2610. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fink, A. & Benedek, M. (2013). EEG alpha power and creative ideation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. Retrieved from *http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.12.002.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the “neurds”: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 1–13. doi: 0.1080/10400410903579494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grabner, R. H., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2007). Brain correlates of self-rated originality of ideas: Evidence from event-related power and phase-locking changes in the EEG. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 224–230. doi: 10.1037/0735–7044.121.1.224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gruber, H. E. (1981). On the relation between ‘a ha’ experiences and the construction of ideas. History of Science, 19, 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Guilford, J.P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS/Knapp.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta, N., Jang, Y., Mednick, S. C. & Huber, D. E. (2012). The Road Not Taken: Creative Solutions Require Avoidance of High-Frequency Responses. Psychological Science, 23, 1–7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611429710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heeger, D. J. & Ress, D. (2002). What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 142–151. doi:10.1038/nrn730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Heilman, K. M., Nadeau, S. E., & Beversdorf, D. O. (2003). Creative innovation: Possible brain mechanism. Neurocase, 9, 369–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W. & McCarthy, G. (2009). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2 ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huang, P., Qiu, L., Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Song, Z., Qi, Z., Gong, Q. & Xie, P. (2013). Evidence for a left-over-right inhibitory mechanism during figurai creative thinking in healthy nonartists. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 2724–2732. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jauk, E., Benedek, M. & Neubauer. A. J. (2012). Tackling creativity at its roots: Evidence for different patterns of EEG alpha activity related to convergent and divergent modes of task processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84, 219–225. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jausovec, N. (2000). Differences in cognitive processes between gifted, intelligent, creative, and average individuals while solving complex problems: An EEG study. Intelligence, 28, 213–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jausovec, N., & Jausovec, K. (2000). EEG activity during the performance of complex mental problems. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36, 73–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalbfleisch, M. L. (2008). Getting to the heart of the brain: Using cognitive neuroscience to explore the nature of human ability and performance. Roeper Review, 30, 162–170. doi: 10.1080/02783190802199321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kalcher, J. & Pfurtscheller, G. (1995). Discrimination between phase-locked and non-phase-locked event-related EEG activity. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 381–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kleibeuker, S. W., Koolschijn, P. C., Jolies, D. D., De Dreu, C. K. & Crone, E. A. (2013). The neural coding of creative idea generation across adolescence and early adulthood. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P. & Hanslmayr, S. (2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53, 63–88. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Koberg, O. & Bagnall, T. (1974). The universal traveler: A soft-systems guide to: Creativity, problem-solving and the process of reaching goals. Menlo Park, CA: Crisp Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Martindale, C. & Hines, D. (1975). creativity and cortical activation during creative, intellectual and EEG feedback tasks. Biological Psychology, 3, 91–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Martindale, C. & Hasenfus, N. (1978). EEG differences as a function of creativity, stage of the creative process, and effort to be original. Biological Psychology, 6, 157–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.137–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mendelsohn, G. A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 44, 341–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Milgram, R. M., & Rabkin, L. (1980). Developmental test of Mednic’ s associative hierarchies of original thinking. Developmental Psychology, 16, 157–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pfurtscheller, G. Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology 110(11), 1842–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pfurtscheller, G. (2001). Functional brain imaging based on ERD/ERS. Vision Research, 41 1257–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ray, W. J. & Cole, H. W. (1985). EEG alpha activity reflects attentional demands, and beta activity reflects emotional and cognitive processes. Science, 228, 750–752. doi: 10.1126/science.3992243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Razumnikova, O. M. (2000). Functional organization of different brain areas during convergent and divergent thinking: an EEG investigation. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Razumnikova, O. M. (2004). Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: An EEG investigation in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 362, 193–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Razumnikova, O. M., Volf, N. V., & Tarasova, I. V. (2009). Strategy and results: Sex differences in electrographic correlates of verbal and figurai creativity. Human Physiology, 35, 285–294. doi: 10.1134/S0362119709030049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (2013). Divergent thinking and creative potential. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1991). The instructional enhancement of the ideational originality and flexibility scores of divergent thinking tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 435–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Runco, M. A., & Richards, R. (Eds.). (1998). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, andhealth. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2011). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking aspredictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty year follow up. Creativity Research journal, 22, 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research journal, 23, 137–154. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.571191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Shah, C., Erhard, K., Ortheil, H., Kaza, E., Kessler, C. & Lotze, M. (2013). Neural correlates of creative writing: AnfMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 1088–1101. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Adler, N., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D. & Mayseless, N. (2011). The origins of originality: The neural bases of creative thinking and originality. Neuropsychologia, 49, 178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Shaw, G. A. (1992). Hyperactivity and creativity: The tacit dimension. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(2), 157–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Simmons, W. K., Hamann, S. B., Harenski, C. L., Hu, X. P. & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing. Journal of Physiology — Paris, 102, 106–119. doi: 0.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Srinivasan, R., Winter, W. R., Ding, J. & Nunez, P. L. (2007). EEG and MEG coherence: Measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 166, 41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Staudt, B. & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). Achievement, underachievement and cortical activation: a comparative EEG study of adolescents of average and above-average intelligence. High Ability Studies, 17 (1), 3–16. doi: 10.1080/13598130600946855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Hashizume, H., Sassa, Y, Nagase, T., Nouchi, R. & Kawashima, R. (2011). Failing to deactivate: The association between brain activity during a working memory task and creativity. Neurolmage, 55, 681–687. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly! Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Vartanian, O., Jobidon, M. E., Bouak, F., Nakashima, A., Smith, I., Lam, Q. & Cheung, B. (2013). Working memory training is associated with lower prefrontal cortex activation in a divergent thinking task. Neuroscience, 236, 186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Volf, N. V. & Tarasova, I. V. (2014). Electrophysiological parameters and the possibility of increasing imaginai creativity using monetary rewards. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 44 (3), 268–276. doi: 10.1007/S11055-014-9906-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Weisberg, R. W. (2013). On the “dõmystification” of insight: A critique of neuroimaging studies of insight. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.752178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Runco.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Runco, M.A., Yoruk, S. The Neuroscience of Divergent Thinking. Act Nerv Super 56, 1–16 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379602

Download citation

Key words

  • Consciousness
  • Creativity
  • Divergent Thinking
  • Neural Correlates