It is thought that hemispheric asymmetry is reflected to behavioral asymmetries. The most prominent behavioral asymmetry is hand preference. This study consisted of two groups (14 each) with different handedness. Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to a visual oddball task were recorded from 19 sites, and another session with a “change detection paradigm” was applied, where the visual scanning pathways were recorded. Although the comparison of P300 grand averages of 19 sites showed no significant difference between the groups, the comparison of the central sites (Fz, Cz, Pz) showed significant differences of both, amplitude and latency, (p<0.05; p<0.04) respectively, where larger amplitudes and longer latencies were found in the right handed group. Both groups have showed larger P300 amplitudes of right hemispheric responses (p<0.01) in inter-hemispheric comparison. The results of “change detection paradigm” have shown no significant difference between the groups. The cognitive processing of visual information was found to be more dominant at the right hemisphere in both groups, and stronger at central sites in right handed subjects than their left handed counter partners. The study included both, right- and left handed subjects, which makes it more specific than the previous studies in the field. The present findings were related with the results of studies which examine the thickness of the skull, the size of corpus callosal area and the functional specialization of hemispheres.
Alexander, J.E., Porjesz, B., Bauer, L.O., Kuperman, S., Morzorati, S., O’Connor, S.J., Rohrbaugh, J., Begleiter, H., & Polich, J. (1995). P300 Hemispheric amplitude asymmetries from a visual oddball task. Psychophysiology, 32, 467–475.
Alexander, J.E., & Polich, J. (1997). Handedness and P300 from auditory stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 35, 259–270.
Annett, M. (1967). The binominal distribution of right, mixed and left handedness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental. Psychology, 19, 327–333.
Annett, M. (1992). Parallels between asymmetries of planum temporale and of hand skill. Neuropsychologia, 30, 951–962.
Annett, M. (1998). Handedness and Cerebral Dominance: The Right Shift Theory. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 10, 459–469.
Bear, M.F., Connors, B.W., & Paradiso, M.A. (2001). Language and attention. Neuroscience, Exploring the Brain. Baltimor: William & Wilkins, 576–614.
Berger, H. (1929). über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 87, 527–570.
Broca, P. (1861). Remarques sur le siege de la faculté du langage articulé; suivies d’une observation d’aphémie (perte de la parole). Bulletins de la Societé Anatomique (Paris), 6, 330–357, 398-407.
Broca, P. (1878). Anatomie compare des circonvolutions cerebrales. Le grand lobe limbique et la scissure limbique dans la série des mammiféres. Revue d’Anthropologie Sér, 2(1), 385–498.
Bosworth, R.G., Petrich, J.A., & Dobkins, K.R. (2012). Effects of spatial attention on motion discrimination are greater in the left than right visual field. Vision Research, 52(1), 11–9.
Chapman, L.J., & Chapman, J.P. (1987). The measurement of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 6, 175–183.
Chui, H.C., & Damasio, A.R. (1980). Human cerebral asymmetries evaluated by computed tomography. Journal of Neurological Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 43, 873–878.
Clark, V., & Hillyard, SA. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 387–402.
Çiçek, M., Gitelman, D., Hurley, R.S., Nobre, A., & Mesulam, M. (2007). Anatomical physiology of spatial extinction. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2892–2898.
Davidson, R.J. (1984). Affect, cognition, and hemispheric specialization. In: C.E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition and behavior, pp. 320–365. England: Cambridge University Press.
Driesen, N.R., & Raz, N. (1995). The influence of sex, age, and handedness of corpus callosum morphology: a meta-analysis. Psychobiology, 23, 240–247.
Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A.M. (1984). Cerebral Dominance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harris, L.J. (1991). Cerebral control for speech in right-handers and left-handers: an analysis of the views of Paul Broca, his contemporaries, and his successors. Brain and Language, 40(1), 1–50.
Hoptman, M.J., & Davidson, R.J. (1994). How and why do the two cerebral hemispheres interact? Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 195–216.
Isoglu-Alkaç, ü. (2009). Beyin arastirmalari tarihinde bir gezinti: Elektronörofizyoloji. Klinik gelisim, 22(3), 14–19.
Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I.Q. (1996). Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology; 4th ed. New York: W.H.
Freeman and Company. Knecht, S., Dräger, B., Deppe, M., Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., & Flöel A., et al. (2000). Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain, 123, 2512–2518.
Nalçaci, E. (2008). Bey in islevlerinin yanallasmasi. In: S. Karakas, (Ed.), Kognitif Nörobilimler,. 149–168.
Ankara: MN Medikal & Nobel Tip Kitap Sarayi. Nalçaci, E., Kalaycioglu, C, Günes, E., & Çiçek, M. (2002). DeEl tercihi anketinin geçerlik ve güvenilirligi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 13(2), 99–106.
Okada, T., Sato, W., Kubota, Y., Toichi, M., & Murai, T. (2012). Right hemispheric dominance and interhemispheric cooperation in gaze-triggered reflexive shift of attention. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 66(2), 97–104.
Polich, J. (1998). P300 clinical utility and control of variability. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 15, 14–33.
Polich, J., & Hoffman, L.D. (1998). P300 and handedness: On the possible contribution of corpus callosal size to ERPs. Psychophysiology, 35, 497–507.
Reinvang, I., Magnussen, S., & Greenlee, M.W. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry in visual discrimination and memory: ERP evidence for the spatial frequency hypothesis. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 483–495.
Rensink, R.A., O’Regan, J.K., & Clark, J.J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368–373.
Simons, D.J., & Levin, D.T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261–267.
Springer, S.P., & Deutsch, G. (1993). Left Brain, Right Brain 4th Edition, New York: W.H. Freeman Company.
Suzuki, M., & Hoshiyama, M. (2011). Difference in P300 response between hemi-field visual stimulation. Neural Sciences, 23, 603–608.
Wada, J. (1949). A new method for the determination of the side of cerebral speech dominance. A preliminary report on the intracarotid injection of Sodium Amytal in man. Igaku to Seibutsugaku Medicine and Biology, 14, 221–222.
Wada, J, & Rasmussen, T. (2007). Intracarotid injection of Sodium Amytal for the Lateralization of Cerebral Speech Dominance, 1960. Journal of Neurosurgery, 106(6), 1117–1133.
Witelson, S.F. (1985). The brain connection: the corpus callosum is larger in left-handers. Science, 229, 665–668.
Wuerger, S., Xiao, K., Mylonas, D., Huang, Q., Karatzas, D., Hird, E., & Paramei, G. (2012). Blue-green color categorization in Mandarin-English speakers. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 29(2), 102–107.
About this article
Cite this article
Eskikurt, G., Yücesir, İ. & İsoglu-Alkac, Ü. The Effect of Handedness on Visual P300 Responses and Visual Scanning Pathways. Act Nerv Super 55, 38–50 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379595
- Event-Related Potentials
- H and preference