Skip to main content
Log in

Significance and Some Limitations of Methods for Evaluating Coals for Coking

  • 25th Ironmaking Conference
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

It may be concluded that data acquired from certain bench-scale tests may be useful to the coke plant operator if the qualitative nature of the data is recognized, and if used largely for screening purposes.

Coal petrography most closely approaches the ideal method.

Conclusions drawn from bench-scale test data require confirmation in pilot-scale test ovens before being applied to commercial practice. However, bench-scale test data, properly applied, can reduce the amount of pilot oven runs required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Classification of Hard Coals by Type, prepared by the Secretariat of the Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, August 1956, United Nations publication.

  2. W. G. Schulze and Glenn C. Soth: Blast Furnace, Coke Oven, and Raw Materials Proceedings, 1960, pp. 58–76.

  3. G. C. Soth and C. C. Russell: Proc. Am. Soc. Test. Mat., 1943, vol. 43, pp. 1176–1193.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. L. Bayer, C. H. Denton and M. G. Chang: “Petrographic Composition and Plastic Properties of Coal”, Division of Fuel Chemistry Symposium on Coal Petrography and Related Materials, 145th National Meeting, American Chemical Society, New York, N. Y., August 13, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Von Dr. rer. nat. Wolfgang Simonis, Gunther Gruschke and Dr. rer. nat. Kurt-Gunther Beck, Essen “Der Einfluss des Koksbildungsvermorgens auf die Koksfestigkeit” Deutscher Kokereiausschuss, June 1966.

  6. N. Schapiro and R. J. Gray: “The Use of Coal Petrography in Coke Making”, Journal of the Institute of Fuel, June 1964.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Sieghardt, W.C., Riva, L.A. & Harris, H.E. Significance and Some Limitations of Methods for Evaluating Coals for Coking. JOM 18, 1337–1340 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03378524

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03378524

Navigation