Abstract
The current status of the several successful thermal reduction and electrolytic methods are reviewed. The economies of thermal and electrolytic plants built and operated by the US government during World War II are compared. At that time economics was in favor of the electrolytic processes, and in view of the present preponderance of electrolytic facilities, it can be so assessed today. Changing aspects of raw materials for the electrolytic processes are considered. Magnesium markets in the United States and other countries are surveyed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. A. Klagsbrunn: Ind. and Eng. Chem., 1945, vol. 37, p. 608.
J. A. Gann: Mining and Metallurgy, 1932, no. 304, vol. 13, pp. 179–83.
R. M. Hunter: Trans. Electrochem. Soc., 1944, vol. 86.
W. P. Schambra: Trans. AIME, 1944, vol. 41.
C. M. Shigley: AIME Metals Technology, 1945, vol. 12, no. 3.
W. G. Harvey: Trans. Electrochem. Soc., 1925, vol. 46.
B. Cartwright, L. Michels, and L. S. Ravitz: Dept. of Interior, US Bureau of Mines, R.I. 3805, 1945.
R. R. Lloyd, C. K. Stoddard, K. L. Mattingly, E. T. Leidigh, and R. G. Knickerbocker: AIME Metals Technology, 1945, vol. 12, no. 3.
A. Labounsky: US Patent 3,093,558, June 11, 1963.
L. G. Dean, F. Olstowski, and K. Posey: US Patent 2,850,151, Mar. 31, 1959.
E. J. Williams, L. G. Dean and C. W. McCutcheon: US Patent 2,888,389, May 26, 1959.
L. G. Dean and C. W. McCutcheon: US Patent 2,950,236, Aug. 23, 1960.
O. Hoehne and D. Korff: Soc. of Auto. Eng. paper 800 B, January 1964.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanawalt, J.D. Present status and future trends in the production of magnesium. JOM 16, 559–563 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03378288
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03378288