Skip to main content
Log in

From Stain to Saint: Ancestry, Archaeology, and Agendas in Tasmania’s Convict Heritage—A View from Port Arthur

  • Article
  • Published:
Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty years of archaeology at Australia’s best-known penal colony, Port Arthur, has spanned the national (1988) and Tasmanian state (2004) bicentenaries. During that period, many Australian archaeological questions and methodologies have remained consistent, while the character of Australian society and popular understandings and uses of its convict beginnings have altered dramatically. One of the most radical shifts felt at Port Arthur stems from a growing public desire for an imagined experience of belonging and nationhood that has the potential to displace evidence-based considerations in the management of Tasmania’s convict places. Current archaeology at the Port Arthur Historic Site has the potential to shed significant light on aspects of convict experience and the processes of colonization; however, the validity of this research is increasingly being challenged by the politics of heritage and national myth making in constructing imaginary white colonial pasts. The recent emergence of the convict national element in Australian postcolonial identity is discussed along with queries about the future role of archaeological research at Port Arthur within the context of changing popular attitudes to convict heritage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, Alison 1998 The Legacy of the Convict System. Tasmanian Historical Studies 6(1):48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australia Icomos 1999 The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Australia ICOMOS Inc., Burwood, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baram, Uzi, and Yorke Rowan 2004 Archaeology after Nationalism: Globalisation and the Consumption of the Past. In Marketing Heritage: Archaeology and the Consumption of the Past, Yorke Rowan and Uzi Baram, editors, pp. 3–26. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Ian 1978 Penal Peninsula: Port Arthur and Its Outstations 1827–1898. Regal Publications, Launceston, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, Shane 2001 Contested Places: Tasmania’s Northern Districts from Ancient Times to 1900. Centre for Tasmanian Historical Studies, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Joan C. 1972 Poverty Is Not a Crime: Social Services in Tasmania 1803–1900. Tasmanian Historical Research Association, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, J. 2005 Campbell Town Convict Brick Trail, Campbell Town, Tasmania <http://www.convictbricktrail.com>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman, John 2002 Archaeology & Heritage: An Introduction. Continuum, London, England, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, Eleanor Conlin 2005 Prisoner of His Majesty: Postcoloniality and the Archaeology of British Penal Transportation. World Archaeology 37(3): 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Alex C. 1991 The Vandemonian Spirit and the Law: 1991 Eldershaw Memorial Lecture. Tasmanian Historical Research Association Papers and Proceedings 38(3):105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Manning 1978 A History of Australia, Vol. 4, The Earth Abideth for Ever 1851–1888. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 A History of Australia, Vol. 5, The People Make Laws, 1888–1915. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Colonial Secretary’s Office 1847 Colonial Secretary’s Office Annual Official, Financial, and Statistical Reports. CS O 50/22, 1 January to 31 December 1847, Archives Office of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, Frank, Alan Gilbert, K. S. Inglis, and Peter Spearritt (editors) 1987 Australia, a Historical Library. Fairfax, Syme and Weldon, Broadway, Australia.

  • Daniels, Kay 1983 Cults of Nature, Cults of History. Island Magazine 16:3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Martin, and Kristal Buckley 1987 Port Arthur Conservation and Development Project Archaeological Procedures Manual. Occasional Paper, No. 13. Department of Lands, Parks, and Wildlife, Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Peter 2005 Isle of the Dead, Potential Archaeological Significance, Isle of the Dead Conservation Management Plan (draft). Manuscript, Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority, Port Arthur, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egloff, Brian 1986 The Port Arthur Story: 1979 to 1986. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldershaw, P. R. 1965 Guide to the Public Records of Tasmania: Section 3, Convict Department, Archives Office of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, Joan 2004 Engaging with Heritage Issues: The Role of the World Archaeological Congress. In Marketing Heritage: Archaeology and the Consumption of the Past, Yorke Rowan and Uzi Baram, editors, pp. 287–294. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Graeme, and Des Tobin 1997 In the Midst of Life: The Australian Response to Death. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurnhill, Anna 2001 Intangible Values, People, and Heritage Places: A Study of the Port Arthur Historic Site. Bachelor honours thesis, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave, John 1993 A Pauper Establishment Is Not a Jail: Old Crawlers in Tasmania 1856–1895. Master’s thesis, Department of History and Classics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell, R. M. 1954 The Economic Development of Van Diemen’s Land 1820–1850. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, John B. 1983 Convict Society and Its Enemies: A History of Early New South Wales. Allen and Unwin, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, Tracey 2004 The Burra Charter and Historical Archaeology: Reflections on the Legacy of Port Arthur. Historic Environment 18(1):25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, Greg 2004 Foetal Shore: The Sea as Critical Medium in the Past and Future of the Tasman Peninsula Convict System. In A Harbour Large Enough to Admit a Whole Fleet: The Maritime History and Archaeology of Port Arthur, Richard Tuffin, Greg Jackman, and Julia Clark, editors, pp. 12–38. Port Arthur Occasional Papers, No. 1. Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority, Port Arthur, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalland, Pat 2002 Australian Ways of Death: A Social and Cultural History 1840–1918. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Ron 2002 Reclaiming the Ancestral Past: Narrative, Rhetoric, and the “Convict Stain.” Journal of Sociology 38(2):111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, David 1998 The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mclachlan, Noel 1989 Waiting for the Revolution: A History of Australian Nationalism. Penguin, Ringwood, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Sharon 1992 Land Settlement in Early Tasmania: Creating an Antipodean England. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Tim 1993 Communication and the Importance of Disciplinary Communities: Who Owns the Past? In Archaeological Theory, Who Sets the Agenda? Norman Yoffee and Andrew Sherratt, editors, pp. 105–116.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority 2005 Port Arthur Convict Database Project (ongoing). Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority, Port Arthur, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Henry 1969 That Hated Stain: The Aftermath of Transportation in Tasmania. Tasmanian Historical Studies 14(53):19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, Lloyd L. 1965 The Convict Settlers of Australia. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 A History of Tasmania, Vol. 1, Van Diemen’s Land from the Earliest Times to 1885. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, Michael 2001 The State of Tasmania: Identity at Federation Time. Tasmanian Historical Research Association, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, Neil 1999 From Masada to Little Bighorn: The Role of Archaeological Site Interpretation in the Shaping of National Myths. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 3(1–2):9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, Terry, and Charles Orser 2003 Descendant Communities: Linking People in the Present to the Past. In Ethical Issues in Archaeology, Larry J. Zimmerman, Karen. D. Vitelli, and Julie Hollowell-Zimmer, editors, pp. 143–152. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Anthony 1999 Myths and Memories of the Nation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasmanian Heritage Council 2002 Practice Note No. 2: Archaeological Requirements. Tasmanian Heritage Council, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, Luke 1994 British Imperialism and Australian Nationalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranter, Bruce, and Donoghue, Jed 2003 Convict Ancestry: A Neglected Aspect of Australian Identity. Nations and Nationalism 9(4):555–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2004 Australian Identity: The Influence of Convicts, Settlers, and ANZACs. Paper presented at the Colonialism and Its Aftermath Conference, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuffin, Richard 2004 Cascades Probation Station: Prison Built on Timber. Tasmanian Historical Research Association 51(2):70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2005 Convict Death and Burial in Van Diemen’s Land: A Comparative Study. Manuscript, Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority, Port Arthur, Tasmania, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Russell 1958 The Australian Legend. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, Charles 2004 Planned Dig on Isle of the Dead Lashed. The Mercury, first edition, 14 January:5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenhofer, Margaret 1981 Port Arthur: A Place of Misery. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, John 1852 The History of Tasmania. Henry Dowling, Launceston, Tasmania. Reprinted in 1981 by Angus and Robertson, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Loong 2003 Managing Identities in Postcolonial Australia. Paper presented at the Critique and Inclusivity Conference, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, David 1996 Making Crime Pay: The Evolution of Convict Tourism in Tasmania. Tasmanian Historical Research Association, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackman, G. From Stain to Saint: Ancestry, Archaeology, and Agendas in Tasmania’s Convict Heritage—A View from Port Arthur. Hist Arch 43, 101–112 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03376764

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03376764

Navigation