Skip to main content
Log in

Fashionable and Work Shoes from a Nineteenth-Century Boston Privy

  • Article
  • Published:
Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1993 excavation of a privy at 27/29 Endicott Street in Boston, Massachusetts, yielded fragments of fashionable and work shoes dating from the 1850s to the 1880s. During these years, two household types lived at the house: all females, some of whom may have been prostitutes, from the 1850s to 1867; and a doctor and his family from 1867 to the 1880s. Three shoe features provide clues about shoe construction and the wearers’ class, gender, and occupation: (1) construction methods, apparent in the soles; (2) style, most evident in shoe uppers; and (3) size. Artifacts provide new evidence of a rand, a shoe part found in the sole.

Excavations of a 19th-century Boston privy and cistern yielded a wide variety of artifacts including glass, ceramics, buttons, leather, textiles, and food remains; the research focused on the leather artifacts, identifi able mostly as shoe fragments, and the occupants of two houses associated with the privy. Over a 30-year period, two different types of households lived at 27/29 Endicott Street. Differences in the leather artifact patterns for each household, based on the construction, style, and sizing of the shoes, provide inferences about the class, gender, and occupation of the occupants. Other archaeological fi nds provide comparative material in relation to prostitution, female boarding houses, shoe styles, and shoe construction (Anderson 1968; Huddleson and Watanabe 1990; Seifert 1991, 1994; Costello et al. 1998). The Endicott Street site artifacts also contain new evidence of a type of rand used in place of a midsole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Adrienne 1968 The Archaeology of Mass-Produced Footwear.Historical Archaeology, 2:56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, Frederick 1867 Improvement in Boots and Shoe-Soles. U.S. Patent 66,548, issued 9 July. United States Patent Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Lewis 1840 Mode of Channeling and Scarfing the Soles of Pumps, Shoes, &c. U.S. Patent 1,752, issued 2 September. United States Patent Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benes, Milena A. 1995 Dr. Padelford’s Privy: A Study of the Socioeconomic Status of a Nineteenth-Century Non-Traditional Physician in Boston. Senior honors thesis, Department of Anthropology, Brandeis University, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blewett, Mary H. 1988 Men, Women, and Work: Class, Gender, and Protest in the New England Shoe Industry, 1780–1910. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Alamanac 1855 Boston Almanac. J.P. Jewett and Co., Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Valuation Lists 1847–1865 Boston Valuation Lists. Street Books, Ward 3, Boston Assessment Department, Boston, MA.

  • Boston Valuation Lists 1866–1875 Boston Valuation Lists. Street Books, Ward 2, Boston Assessment Department, Boston, MA.

  • Boston Valuation Lists 1876–1880 Boston Valuation Lists. Street Books, Ward 7, Boston Assessment Department, Boston, MA.

  • Brooke, Iris 1972 Footwear: A Short History of European and American Shoes. Theatre Arts Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, Jeffrey A. 1998 Forming the Past. Historical Archaeology, 32(3): 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, Samuel Smith 1876 Delightful History of Ye Gentle Craft: An Illustrated History of Feet Costume, 2nd edition. Taylor and Son, Northampton, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, Charles D. 1998 Introduction. Historical Archaeology, 32(3):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, Charles D., and Donna J. Seifert 1994 Neighborhoods and Household Types in Nineteenth-Century Washington, DC. In Historical Archaeology of the Chesapeake, Paul A. Shackel and Barbara J. Little, editors, pp. 267–281. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, Julia, Adrian Praetzellis, Mary Praetzellis, Judith Marvin, Michael D. Meyer, Erica S. Gibson, Grace H. Ziesing 1998 [Working Draft] Historical Archaeology at the Headquarters Facility Project Site, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Report to Union Station Partners, Altadena California, on behalf of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Environmental Planning Branch, Los Angeles, CA, from Foothill Resources, Mokilumne Hill; Applied Earthworks, Fresno; and The Anthropological Studies Center, Rohnert Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, James 1839 The Guide to Trade: The Shoemaker. Charles Knight, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, William H. 1912 A Manual of Shoemaking and Leather and Rubber Products. Little, Brown, and Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, Martin 1999 Consumer Choice Analysis with Mixed Household Assemblages: A Case Study from Boston on Consumer Identity and Variables of Choice. Paper presented at the Northeastern Anthropological Association, Providence, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Thomas Richard 1870 Improvement in Shoes. U.S. Patent 103,164, issued 17 May. United States Patent Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, William 1864 Improved Shoe-String. U.S. Patent 42,759, issued 17 May. United States Patent Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, Fred A. 1912 A Short History of American Shoemaking. Newcomb and Gauss, Salem, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geismar, Joan 1993 Where is the Night Soil? Thoughts on an Urban Privy. Historical Archaeology, 27(2):57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gernsheim, Alison 1981 Victorian and Edwardian Fashion: A Photographic Survey. Dover Publications, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godey’s Lady’s Book 1859–1887. Godey’s Lady’s Book. L. A. Godey, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Greig, T. Watson 1885 Ladies’ Old-Fashioned Shoes. David Douglas, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. Sparkes 1847 The Book of the Feet: A History of Boots and Shoes. William H. Graham, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Edward C. 1989 Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, Barbara Meil 1987 Uneasy Virtue: The Politics of Prostitution and the American Reform Tradition. Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleson, Julia E., and Mitsuru Watanabe 1990 Pegged Footwear from 1851 San Francisco. Historical Archaeology, Special Publications Series, 7:94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, Paul 1862 Histoire de la Chaussure. Adolphe Delahays, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lady [psued.] 1856 Every Lady Her Own Shoemaker; or a Complete Self-Instructor in the Art of Making Gaitors and Shoes. Dewitt and Davenport Publishers, New York, NY.

  • Lansdell, Avril 1985 Fashion a la Carte 1860–1900. Shire Publications, Aylesbury, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeeDecker, Charles H., Terry H. Klein, Cheryl A. Holt, and Amy Friedlander 1987 Nineteenth-Century Households and Consumer Behavior in Wilmington, Delaware. In Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology, Suzanne M. Spencer-Wood, editor, pp. 233–259. Plenum Press, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leno, John Bedford 1887 The Art of Boot and Shoemaking, 2nd edition. Crosby Lockwood, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics 1855 State Census for Boston. Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics 1865 State Census for Boston. Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, Charles H. 1920 A History of the Shoe and Leather Industries of the United States, Vol. 1. John W. Denehy, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIver, Jack Alexander (editor) 1994 All about Shoes: Footwear through the Ages. Bata, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Gordon 1865 Improved Channeled Soles. U.S. Patent 48,238, issued 13 June. United States Patent Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George L. 1988 Classification and Economic Scaling of Nineteenth-Century Ceramics. In Documentary Archaeology in the New World, M. C. Beaudry, editor, pp. 172–183. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, George P. 1949 Social Structure. Free Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson’s Magazine 1848–1892 Peterson’s Magazine. C. J. Peterson, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Redfern, W. I. 1904 Royal and Historic Gloves and Shoes. Methuen, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexford, Nancy E. 2000 Women’s Shoes in America, 1795–1930. Kent State University Press, Kent, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, W. H., Jr. 1858 The Boot and Shoe Manufacturers’ Assistant and Guide. Higgins, Bradley and Dayton, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, Paula Bradstreet 1991 Following the Footprints of the Past: The Shoe Collections of the Essex Institute. Essex Institute Historical Collections, 127(2): 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Ruth 1982 The Lost Sisterhood, Prostitution in America, 1900–1918. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saguto, D.A 1984 The Wooden Shoe Peg and Pegged Construction in Footwear: Their Historical Origins. The Chronicle of the Early American Industries Association, 37(1): 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, William W. 1939 The History of Prostitution, Its Extent, Causes, and Effects throughout the World, new edition. AMS Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, Donna J. 1991 Within Site [Sight] of the White House: The Archaeology of Working Women. Historical Archaeology, 25(4):82–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, Donna J. 1994 Mrs. Starr’s Profession. In Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, E. M. Scott, editor, pp. 149–173. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severa, Joan L. 1995 Dressed for the Photographer: Ordinary Americans and Fashion, 1840–1900. Kent State University Press, Kent, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoe and Leather Reporter 1842–1957 Shoe and Leather Reporter. Shoe and Leather Reporter Co., Boston, MA.

  • South, Stanley 1977 Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansell, Christine 1986 City of Women: Sex and Class in New York, 1789–1860. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Sarah C. 2000 Costume-Related Artifacts from the Mill Pond Site, Boston, Massachusetts. Master’s thesis, Textiles, Fashion Merchandising, and Design, University of Rhode Island, Kingston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, June 1982 Shoes. B. T. Batford, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Walter C. 1916 The Shoe and Leather Lexicon, 3rd edition. Boot and Shoe Recorder Publishing, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census 1860 Federal Census for Boston. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census 1870 Federal Census for Boston. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, Henry 1866 Improvement in Boots and Shoes. U.S. Patent 55,188, issued 29 May. United States Patent Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R. Turner 1948 The Mode in Footwear. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Eunice 1969 A History of Shoe Fashions. Pitman Publishing, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stevens, S.C., Ordoñez, M.T. Fashionable and Work Shoes from a Nineteenth-Century Boston Privy. Hist Arch 39, 9–25 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03376701

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03376701

Navigation