Skip to main content
Log in

Remote sensing applications in forensic investigations

  • Article
  • Published:
Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forensic investigations concern locating, identifying, collecting, and cataloging physical evidence for the purpose of presenting it in court. One aspect of forensic investigations concerns locating clandestine evidence which is often concealed in the subsurface. This task is typically guided by information provided by informants (pathological liars), witnesses, psychics, and sometimes suspects. Resultant searches may be time consuming and frustrating to understaffed departments. Often such searches lead to excavations that destroy evidence. Any nondestructive method used to reduce the time spent on searches and excavations and to increase the probability of locating physical evidence are of prime interest to the law enforcement community. Remote sensing methods, which are nondestructive, are currently being applied with promising results in forensic investigations. Some of the more promising methods, including infrared, magnetics, electromagnetics, and ground penetrating radar are discussed. Remote sensing methods when properly applied can provide the forensic investigator tremendous savings in time and cost in the search for physical evidence. The forensic investigator must be educated to understand that there is no remote sensing method that will consistently find a body or physical evidence. These methods locate anomalous areas, and the cause of these anomalies will only be fully understood upon examination by others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruschlinsky, N. N., A V. Danilov, K. M. Muminov, D. Israilov, V. Stetsuk, and M. Kh. Usmanov 1997 Magnetometric Method of Investigating Fire Sites. Fire Technology, 33(3):195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuel, L. 1971 Flights Into Yesterday. MacDonald, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymouth, John W. 1986 Geophysical Methods of Archaeological Site Surveying. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 9, Michael B. Schiffer, editor, pp 311–330. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

A Selected Bibliography of Remote Sensing

  • Amato, L. and G. Di Maio 1990 Ground Penetrating Radar for the Identification of Stratigraphic and Sedimentologic Features in Archaeological Investigation of the Volcanoclastic Sequence of AD 79 Vesuvian Eruption-Pompeii-Southern Italy. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Lakewood, CO.

  • Bevan, Brice 1983 Electromagnetics for Mapping Buried Earth Features. Journal of Field Archaeology, 10(1):47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, Bruce, D. G. Orr, and B. S. Blades 1984 The Discovery of the Taylor House at the Petersburg National Battlefield. Historical Archaeology, 18(2):64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, Bruce 1991 The Search for Graves. Geophysics, 56(9): 1310–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briener, S. 1973 Applications Manual for Portable Magnetometers. Geometrics, Sunnyvale, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briener, S. and M. D. Coe 1972 Magnetic Exploration of the Olmec Civilization. American Scientist, 60(5):566–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, J. 1988 Fundamentals of Ground Penetrating Radar. In Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, March 1998, pp. 62–142. Golden, CO.

  • Davenport, G. Clark and Stephan L. De Vore 1991 Geophysical Techniques in Archaeology, Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, Colorado. Paper presented at Workshop, Cosponsored by Interagency Archaeological Services, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, National Park Service, Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, G. Clark, Tom J. Griffin, J. W. Lindemann, and D. Heimmer 1990 Geoscientists and Law Officers Work Together in Colorado. Geotimes, 35(7):13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, G. Clark, T. J. Griffin, John W. Lindemann, and J. Borowski 1988 Geotechnical Applications 3, Crime Scene Investigation Techniques. Geophysics, 7(8):64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L. and A. P. Annan 1989 Ground Penetrating Radar for High-Resolution Mapping of Soil and Rock Stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting, 37(5):531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrin, M. B. and C. H. Savit 1988 Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, James I. 1984 Remote Sensing Applications in Archaeology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7, Michael B. Schiffer, editor, pp. 311–330. Academic Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E., G. E. McMechan, and A. P. Annan 1992 Acquisition and Processing of Wide-Aperture Ground Penetrating Radar Data. Geophysics, 57(3):495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France, Diane L., Tom J. Griffin, Jack G. Swanburg, John W. Lindemann, G. Clark Davenport, Vickey Trammell, C. T. Armbrust, Boris Kondratieff, Al Nelson, K. Castellano, and D. Hopkins 1992 A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Detection of Clandestine Graves. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 37(6):1445–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimmer, D. H., G. Clark Davenport, John W. Lindemann, and J. B. Gilmore 1989 Geophysics for Archaeological Assessment: Ft. William Discovered? Ft. Laramie National Historical Site, Wyoming. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, March 1989, pp. 448–455. Golden, CO.

  • Hoving, G. L. 1986 Buried Body Search Technology. Identification News, 3(15)3, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, T., T. Sakayama, and T. Kanemori 1987 Use of Ground-probing Radar and Resistivity Surveys for Archaeological Investigations. Geophysics, 52(2):137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. 1969 Remote Sensing in Ecology. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killam, E. W. 1990 The Detection of Human Remains. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linington, R. E. 1963 The Application of Geophysics to Archaeology. American Scientist, 51(1):48–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellett, J. S. 1991 Shallow Geophysical Methods, Especially Ground Penetrating Radar and Electromagnetics in Forensic Investigations. Proceedings, Location Of Human Remains Conference, pp. 1–12. FBI New York Division, Valhalla, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellett, J. and J. Geismar 1990 GPR Survey of an African-American Cemetery in Little Ferry, NJ. Third International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, IEEE Digest, Lakewood, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrington, M. 1979 Geophysical and Aerial Prospecting Techniques at Valley Forge National Historic Park, Pennsylvania. Journal of Field Archaeology, 6(2):193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, S. 1990 Burial Detection Using Ground Penetrating Radar. Third International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Lakewood, CO.

  • Piccolo, M. 1990 Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys for Archaeological Purposes. Third International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Lakewood, CO.

  • Tite, M. S., and C. Mullins 1970 Electromagnetic Prospecting on Archaeological Sites Using a Soil Conductivity Meter. Archaeometry, 12(1):97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Frese, R. R. B., and Vergil E. Noble 1984 Magnetometry for Archaeological Exploration of Historical Sites. Historical Archaeology, 18(2):38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymouth, John W., and Bruce Bevan 1983 Combined Magnetic and Ground Penetrating Radar Survey of an Archaeological Site in Oklahoma. Paper presented the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, San Francisco, CA.

  • Wynn, J. C. 1986 A Review of Geophysical Methods Used in Archaeology. Geoarchaeology, 1(3):245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davenport, G.C. Remote sensing applications in forensic investigations. Hist Arch 35, 87–100 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03374530

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03374530

Navigation